Skip to content

Conversation

AwesomePatrol
Copy link
Contributor

Discussion in Google Docs or cilium/cilium#34577

Signed-off-by: Aleksander Mistewicz <amistewicz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Aleksander Mistewicz <amistewicz@google.com>
@joestringer
Copy link
Member

cc @cilium/sig-lb

Signed-off-by: Aleksander Mistewicz <amistewicz@google.com>
@AwesomePatrol AwesomePatrol marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2024 07:21
@kl52752
Copy link
Contributor

kl52752 commented Oct 22, 2024

cc @kl52752

@pchaigno
Copy link
Member

@kl52752 Note you can subscribe to issues and pull requests with the button on the side 👇 🙂

Copy link
Member

@brb brb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. I've commented in the Google Doc. LGTM as sig-lb. Please base the implementation on top of cilium/cilium#35430 (cc @joamaki).

@borkmann
Copy link
Member

LGTM, commented in the Google doc as well, I presume eventually this would need to be updated. From the G doc discussion, looks like we're all on the same page. Happy to help pushing this forward!

Copy link
Member

@joestringer joestringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the text here is not yet synced with the latest on the Google doc. When the google doc discussion is completed, please update this before we approve+merge.

I proposed some minor changes. @@kl52752 it looks like you're taking over this effort after @AwesomePatrol, is that right? Do you have access to change the branch here? If not, maybe it makes sense to reopen a fresh copy of this PR with the updates from the doc.

@joestringer joestringer added the dont-merge/discussion Active discussions should be resolved before merging this PR label Oct 24, 2024
@kl52752 kl52752 force-pushed the per-service-lb-algorithm-selection branch from 0a1d8b2 to e8a9a70 Compare October 25, 2024 08:04
Signed-off-by: Katarzyna Lach <katarzynalach@google.com>
@kl52752 kl52752 force-pushed the per-service-lb-algorithm-selection branch from e8a9a70 to 78af291 Compare October 29, 2024 15:37
Copy link
Member

@joestringer joestringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand that the CFP is now synced to the latest comments on the doc and should be about ready to merge, is that correct?

I added some minor comments below mostly just to line the proposal up with the latest template formats, but this seems like it should be good to merge.

Co-authored-by: Joe Stringer <joestringernz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: kl52752 <89914070+kl52752@users.noreply.github.com>
@kl52752
Copy link
Contributor

kl52752 commented Nov 22, 2024

I understand that the CFP is now synced to the latest comments on the doc and should be about ready to merge, is that correct?

I added some minor comments below mostly just to line the proposal up with the latest template formats, but this seems like it should be good to merge.

yes the proposal is synced with the doc,
than you for your comments. I responded PTAL

Co-authored-by: Joe Stringer <joestringernz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: kl52752 <89914070+kl52752@users.noreply.github.com>
@joestringer joestringer removed the dont-merge/discussion Active discussions should be resolved before merging this PR label Nov 25, 2024
@joestringer joestringer merged commit ece9b5d into cilium:main Nov 26, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants