Skip to content

workflows: Remove kvstore related configs in conformance-multi-pool #39754

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

pippolo84
Copy link
Member

@pippolo84 pippolo84 commented May 27, 2025

Multi-Pool IPAM does not officially support KVStore yet, therefore we should not generate KVStore related configurations in conformance-multi-pool workflow.
In #39561 those configs were added inadvertently, but they are actually equal to the previous ones, since the workflow has not yet been updated to test kvstore too.

Fixes: 0598e0b ("ci/multi-pool: Generate config matrix from file")
Related: #39561

Multi-Pool IPAM does not officially support KVStore yet, therefore we
should not generate KVStore related configurations in
conformance-multi-pool workflow.

Fixes: 0598e0b ("ci/multi-pool: Generate config matrix from file")

Signed-off-by: Fabio Falzoi <fabio.falzoi@isovalent.com>
@pippolo84 pippolo84 requested review from a team as code owners May 27, 2025 18:11
@pippolo84 pippolo84 added the kind/bug/CI This is a bug in the testing code. label May 27, 2025
@pippolo84 pippolo84 requested a review from joestringer May 27, 2025 18:11
@pippolo84 pippolo84 added area/CI Continuous Integration testing issue or flake area/multipool Affects Multi-Pool IPAM labels May 27, 2025
@pippolo84 pippolo84 requested a review from Artyop May 27, 2025 18:11
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes. label May 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@joestringer joestringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good from @cilium/github-sec perspective. Did you want feedback from anyone else for instance in @cilium/sig-ipam ?

@joestringer joestringer added the release-note/ci This PR makes changes to the CI. label May 27, 2025
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot removed the dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes. label May 27, 2025
@pippolo84
Copy link
Member Author

Changes look good from @cilium/github-sec perspective. Did you want feedback from anyone else for instance in @cilium/sig-ipam ?

I don't think we need it, it's just a removal of two additional configs that were actually the same as the two before, since we don't have support for kvstore yet.
They ended up in the multipool workflow too early and should be part of #39638 (still WIP) instead.

@joestringer joestringer enabled auto-merge May 27, 2025 19:11
@joestringer
Copy link
Member

/test

@pippolo84
Copy link
Member Author

@joestringer joestringer added this pull request to the merge queue May 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into cilium:main with commit 1c13836 May 29, 2025
76 of 77 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/CI Continuous Integration testing issue or flake area/multipool Affects Multi-Pool IPAM kind/bug/CI This is a bug in the testing code. release-note/ci This PR makes changes to the CI.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants