docs: WireGuard doesn't require overlay port in Network Firewalls #36208
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When using WireGuard, all of Cilium's overlay network traffic is encrypted and not visible to the network. Therefore the overlay port doesn't need to be allowed in Network Firewalls. Also see f604ce2 ("docs: update note on WireGuard with tunnel routing"). Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@isovalent.com>
|
/test |
brb
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2024
This was referenced Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When using WireGuard, all of Cilium's overlay network traffic is encrypted and not visible to the network. Therefore the overlay port doesn't need to be allowed in Network Firewalls.
Also see f604ce2 ("docs: update note on WireGuard with tunnel routing").