Skip to content

Conversation

oblazek
Copy link
Contributor

@oblazek oblazek commented Jan 5, 2024

Related slack thread: https://cilium.slack.com/archives/CDKG8NNHK/p1704378628377709

Fix was merged yesterday, so it's already present in the cilium-ci release, tested locally that it now works as expected.

test: add standalone l4lb test to verify that traffic works even when cilium agent is restarted

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Blazek ondrej.blazek@firma.seznam.cz

@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes. label Jan 5, 2024
@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Jan 5, 2024

/ci-l4lb

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Jan 5, 2024

/test

@maintainer-s-little-helper
Copy link

Commit a5cb525 does not match "(?m)^Signed-off-by:".

Please follow instructions provided in https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/contributing/development/contributing_guide/#developer-s-certificate-of-origin

@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the dont-merge/needs-sign-off The author needs to add signoff to their commits before merge. label Jan 5, 2024
@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Jan 5, 2024

/ci-l4lb

@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot removed the dont-merge/needs-sign-off The author needs to add signoff to their commits before merge. label Jan 5, 2024
@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Jan 5, 2024

/ci-l4lb

@oblazek oblazek changed the title test: l4lb verify that rqs to service fail when agent is starting test: l4lb add test to verify that rqs to service do not fail when agent is starting Jan 10, 2024
@oblazek oblazek force-pushed the ob-l4lb-fail branch 2 times, most recently from 5736373 to adb2850 Compare January 11, 2024 08:00
@oblazek oblazek marked this pull request as ready for review January 11, 2024 08:02
@oblazek oblazek requested review from a team as code owners January 11, 2024 08:02
@oblazek oblazek requested review from aspsk and tklauser January 11, 2024 08:02
@oblazek oblazek changed the title test: l4lb add test to verify that rqs to service do not fail when agent is starting test: standalone l4lb add test to verify that rqs to service do not fail when agent is starting Jan 11, 2024
@tklauser tklauser added the release-note/ci This PR makes changes to the CI. label Jan 11, 2024
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot removed the dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes. label Jan 11, 2024
@tklauser
Copy link
Member

/ci-l4lb

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Jan 11, 2024

ci-l4lb test results here https://github.com/cilium/cilium/actions/runs/7486837738

Copy link
Contributor

@aspsk aspsk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, left one minor question

@tklauser tklauser enabled auto-merge January 12, 2024 09:20
@tklauser
Copy link
Member

/test

1 similar comment
@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Jan 29, 2024

/test

Add a test so that traffic continues to work when cilium agent
is being restarted. Bpf programs should be atomically swaped
so there shouldn't be any drops.

Signed-off-by: Ondrej Blazek <ondrej.blazek@firma.seznam.cz>
auto-merge was automatically disabled February 5, 2024 13:26

Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 5, 2024

rebased, retriggering tests

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 5, 2024

/test

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 5, 2024

/ci-runtime

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 6, 2024

/ci-ginkgo

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 6, 2024

/ci-l4lb

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 7, 2024

/ci-ginkgo

@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 7, 2024

/ci-ginkgo

1 similar comment
@oblazek
Copy link
Contributor Author

oblazek commented Feb 8, 2024

/ci-ginkgo

@tklauser tklauser added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 8, 2024
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. label Feb 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into cilium:main with commit 4d05b07 Feb 8, 2024
borkmann added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
The test is currently causing a lot of flakes, so it looks like we
need to revisit #30163 to figure out why it is still not addressed.

Related: #30114
Closes: #30707
Closes: #24728
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
borkmann added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
The test is currently causing a lot of flakes, so it looks like we
need to revisit #30163 to figure out why it is still not addressed.

Related: #30114
Closes: #30707
Closes: #24728
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
dlapcevic pushed a commit to dlapcevic/cilium that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
The test is currently causing a lot of flakes, so it looks like we
need to revisit cilium#30163 to figure out why it is still not addressed.

Related: cilium#30114
Closes: cilium#30707
Closes: cilium#24728
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Pionerd pushed a commit to Pionerd/cilium that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
The test is currently causing a lot of flakes, so it looks like we
need to revisit cilium#30163 to figure out why it is still not addressed.

Related: cilium#30114
Closes: cilium#30707
Closes: cilium#24728
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has passed all tests and received consensus from code owners to merge. release-note/ci This PR makes changes to the CI.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants