Skip to content

ipam: test to skip the sync #40760

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

ipam: test to skip the sync #40760

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

liyihuang
Copy link
Contributor

comment out the sync and add more eks tests to see it will resolve the issue #36428

Fixes: #36428

<!-- Enter the release note text here if needed or remove this section! -->

comment out the sync and add more eks tests to see it will resolve the issue #36428

Signed-off-by: Liyi Huang <liyi.huang@isovalent.com>
@maintainer-s-little-helper maintainer-s-little-helper bot added the dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes. label Jul 28, 2025
@liyihuang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-eks

@mathpl
Copy link
Contributor

mathpl commented Aug 5, 2025

Refering to #36428 (comment), @liyihuang changes under .github/ at not taken into account when opening a PR as it would be a security issue. Ex: Modify a workflow print all the secrets. Committers can test these type of changes in collab with you.

@liyihuang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-eks

1 similar comment
@liyihuang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/ci-eks

liyihuang added a commit to liyihuang/cilium that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2025
this is the temporary fix for ENI mode to avoid the sync from AWS getting the stale data since
we would like to see if this can fix the CI issue for cilium#36428
based on the discussion here cilium#36428 (comment)
if so, we will change how alibaba and azure behavior like PR cilium#37650
and remove this instanceSync trigger sync from here completely.
I have tested skip this trigger sync with draft PR cilium#40760 for a few times
and it seems to be working. we hope we can test this for 2-4 weeks so we can know if the CI issue got fixed. if we dont see the CI issue again, we will have the follow up PR to change Azure and Alibaba cloud and remove this trigger.

Signed-off-by: Liyi Huang <liyi.huang@isovalent.com>
liyihuang added a commit to liyihuang/cilium that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2025
this is the temporary fix for ENI mode to avoid the sync from AWS getting the stale data since
we would like to see if this can fix the CI issue for cilium#36428
based on the discussion here cilium#36428 (comment)
if so, we will change how alibaba and azure behavior like PR cilium#37650
and remove this instanceSync trigger sync from here completely.
I have tested skip this trigger sync with draft PR cilium#40760 for a few times
and it seems to be working. we hope we can test this for 2-4 weeks so we can know if the CI issue got fixed. if we dont see the CI issue again, we will have the follow up PR to change Azure and Alibaba cloud and remove this trigger.

Signed-off-by: Liyi Huang <liyi.huang@isovalent.com>
liyihuang added a commit to liyihuang/cilium that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2025
this is the temporary fix for ENI mode to avoid the sync from AWS getting the stale data since
we would like to see if this can fix the CI issue for cilium#36428
based on the discussion here cilium#36428 (comment)
if so, we will change how alibaba and azure behavior like PR cilium#37650
and remove this instanceSync trigger sync from here completely.
I have tested skip this trigger sync with draft PR cilium#40760 for a few times
and it seems to be working. we hope we can test this for 2-4 weeks so we can know if the CI issue got fixed. if we dont see the CI issue again, we will have the follow up PR to change Azure and Alibaba cloud and remove this trigger.

Signed-off-by: Liyi Huang <liyi.huang@isovalent.com>
@liyihuang liyihuang closed this Aug 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dont-merge/needs-release-note-label The author needs to describe the release impact of these changes.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CI: Conformance EKS - no-errors-in-logs - Unable to assign additional IPs to interface, will create new interface
2 participants