Skip to content

Conversation

zhang-ivy
Copy link

@zhang-ivy zhang-ivy commented Jul 27, 2022

Backports some pymbar4 changes to resolve the warning.

See this comment for explanation for why the warning arises in pymbar3, but not pymbar4

@zhang-ivy zhang-ivy requested review from mrshirts and mikemhenry July 27, 2022 16:18
@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

@zhang-ivy boot strapping has been merged, after we get this PR merged in, I think we are ready for a new pymbar3 LTS release?

@mikemhenry mikemhenry added the pymbar-3-lts related to pymbar 3 lts support branch label Jul 27, 2022
@zhang-ivy
Copy link
Author

@mikemhenry : Yes, I agree!

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #470 (47afbd5) into pymbar-3-lts (51a0aed) will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@mrshirts
Copy link
Collaborator

Probably should do a bit of adjustment on the RTD manual and the docstrings, but depends on the urgency of release.

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

@mrshirts are there some formatting errors? I am looking at RTD now to make sure we build the 3.0.x version.

@mrshirts
Copy link
Collaborator

It didn't do things like have many of the modules documented, etc. I had a todo to go in and clean things up, but have not done that yet.

@mikemhenry
Copy link
Contributor

Okay I will work on the RTD fixes here #471 and use that PR to get things setup for our first new release on the LTS branch.

So now back to this PR:
@mrshirts does this PR look correct?

Copy link
Collaborator

@mrshirts mrshirts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@mikemhenry mikemhenry merged commit 50dfbc9 into pymbar-3-lts Jul 27, 2022
@mikemhenry mikemhenry deleted the fix-divide-by-zero branch July 28, 2022 21:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pymbar-3-lts related to pymbar 3 lts support branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants