Skip to content

Conversation

sequencer
Copy link
Member

We use this api in our flow to replace the sram-repl:
See chipsalliance/t1@7862959

Contributor Checklist

  • Did you add Scaladoc to every public function/method?
  • Did you add at least one test demonstrating the PR?
  • Did you delete any extraneous printlns/debugging code?
  • Did you specify the type of improvement?
  • Did you add appropriate documentation in docs/src?
  • Did you request a desired merge strategy?
  • Did you add text to be included in the Release Notes for this change?

Type of Improvement

  • Feature (or new API)
  • API modification
  • API deprecation
  • Backend code generation
  • Performance improvement
  • Bugfix
  • Documentation or website-related
  • Dependency update
  • Internal or build-related (includes code refactoring/cleanup)

Desired Merge Strategy

  • Squash: The PR will be squashed and merged (choose this if you have no preference).
  • Rebase: You will rebase the PR onto master and it will be merged with a merge commit.

Release Notes

Reviewer Checklist (only modified by reviewer)

  • Did you add the appropriate labels? (Select the most appropriate one based on the "Type of Improvement")
  • Did you mark the proper milestone (Bug fix: 3.6.x, 5.x, or 6.x depending on impact, API modification or big change: 7.0)?
  • Did you review?
  • Did you check whether all relevant Contributor checkboxes have been checked?
  • Did you do one of the following when ready to merge:
    • Squash: You/ the contributor Enable auto-merge (squash), clean up the commit message, and label with Please Merge.
    • Merge: Ensure that contributor has cleaned up their commit history, then merge with Create a merge commit.

@sequencer sequencer added the Feature New feature, will be included in release notes label Oct 3, 2024
@sequencer
Copy link
Member Author

We are prototyping a new API for SRAMDescription to extract SRAM based on the panamaom, thus snap this into master, feel free to modify for better API.

@sequencer sequencer merged commit dd2f57e into main Oct 12, 2024
15 checks passed
@sequencer sequencer deleted the sram-om branch October 12, 2024 11:35
debs-sifive pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2024
* switch SRAMDescription to Class

* fix up tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature New feature, will be included in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants