Skip to content

Conversation

caarlos0
Copy link
Member

@caarlos0 caarlos0 commented Dec 3, 2024

Fixes #695

Changes

  • --no-strict was erroring as non-existent option
  • when --no-strict, we should actually create a "fake" option with whatever the user is typing

@caarlos0 caarlos0 self-assigned this Dec 3, 2024
@caarlos0 caarlos0 added bug Something isn't working cmd/filter labels Dec 3, 2024
- `--no-strict` was erroring as non-existent option
- when `--no-strict`, we should actually create a "fake" option with
  whatever the user is typing

Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@users.noreply.github.com>
@caarlos0 caarlos0 force-pushed the fix-filter-no-strict branch from 20fcdc7 to 9841b5f Compare December 4, 2024 13:33
@caarlos0 caarlos0 merged commit 29250f8 into main Dec 4, 2024
12 checks passed
@caarlos0 caarlos0 deleted the fix-filter-no-strict branch December 4, 2024 13:34
@bashbunni bashbunni added this to the v0.15.0 milestone Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working cmd/filter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

gum filter --no-strict limits the possibility to use shorter values partially matching the options
3 participants