Category

Documentation and code comments

Describe the feature you'd like to request

When the cedar evaluator errors because you called a non-existent extension function, it would be nice if the error message included a suggestion of what you might have meant. The Cedar validator does this now for bad attribute names.

Ex:
If my policy is contains: context.src.isInRange(Ip("1.1.1.1/24")), the error message right now says:

poorly formed: `Ip` is not a function

It would be nice if it said something like this:

poorly formed: `Ip` is not a function. Did you mean `ip`?

Describe alternatives you've considered

No alternatives

Additional context

No response

Is this something that you'd be interested in working on?

• 👋 I may be able to implement this feature request
• ⚠️ This feature might incur a breaking change