Multi-step reaction SMILES? #33
Description
Not sure if this is feasible ... but wanted to ask ;-)
The reaction SMILES functionality is awesome ... any chance we can deal with more steps?
The top three of these work ... the bottom one is invalid ... but would represent the flow of the top three.
Top two: individual steps. Third: a "two step" reaction that works ... Fourth: nice to have but invalid.
If it's already possible and I just got the syntax wrong, I'm all ears!
C(=O)(C(C(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O>[CF2 loss]>C(=O)(C(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O PFHpA to PFHxA
C(=O)(C(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O>[CF2 loss]>C(=O)(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O PFHxA to PFPeA
C(=O)(C(C(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O>[CF2 loss (x2)]>C(=O)(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O PFHpA to PFPeA
C(=O)(C(C(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O>[CF2 loss]>C(=O)(C(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O>[CF2 loss]>C(=O)(C(C(C(C(F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)(F)F)O PFHpA to PFHxA to PFPeA