Skip to content

Conversation

johnmay
Copy link
Member

@johnmay johnmay commented Jul 18, 2020

There are better LogP predictors (e.g. ALogP and JPLogP) - on the one hand I think hmm this could be useful to preserve for prosperity. However often the methods have very obvious coding bugs/misunderstandings.

Like here... the alpha amino pattern expected by the tests doesn't match proline.
Also works on explicit hydrogens - sigh. Anyways tests are parsing but that doesn't mean much so want to read the XLogP paper to see how faithful this is to the actual description.

@egonw egonw marked this pull request as draft December 9, 2020 06:11
…s now clearer what each

pattern is and should run slightly faster since UIT is an MCS finding alogrithm instead of
a simple substructure match.
@johnmay johnmay force-pushed the patch/xlog-cleanup branch from 9f1c7d2 to de8e6a8 Compare February 5, 2022 13:12
@johnmay johnmay marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2022 13:13
@johnmay
Copy link
Member Author

johnmay commented Feb 5, 2022

Providing all checks okay - this is good to go. I never had time to lookup the paper but it is now cleaner

@johnmay johnmay changed the title WIP Use SMARTS in XLogP instead of MCS UIT Feb 5, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 5, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@egonw egonw merged commit 30738c7 into master Feb 9, 2022
@johnmay johnmay deleted the patch/xlog-cleanup branch February 9, 2022 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants