Skip to content

fix FP16 mode #441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2019
Merged

fix FP16 mode #441

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2019

Conversation

TezRomacH
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add fp16_params to the very first cell. And user can choose if he needs FP16.

Related Issue

#437

Type of Change

  • Examples / docs / tutorials / contributors update
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Improvement (non-breaking change which improves an existing feature)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • I have read the CODE_OF_CONDUCT document.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have checked the code-style using make check-style.
  • I have written the docstring in Google format for all the methods and classes that I used.
  • I have checked the docs using make check-docs.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

You'll be able to see Jupyter notebook diff and discuss changes. Powered by ReviewNB.

@TezRomacH TezRomacH mentioned this pull request Oct 12, 2019
Closed
@TezRomacH TezRomacH requested a review from Scitator October 12, 2019 09:13
@TezRomacH TezRomacH added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 12, 2019
@Scitator Scitator merged commit 84b4baa into master Oct 12, 2019
@TezRomacH TezRomacH deleted the fix/437 branch October 12, 2019 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Scitator Scitator Awaiting requested review from Scitator Scitator is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@TezRomacH @Scitator