Automatic Review

The deletion of the review.yml file raises several concerns:

1. Completeness: The removal of this workflow file means that the static analysis checks using staticcheck will no longer run on pull requests. This can lead to issues going unnoticed in the codebase, as code quality checks are crucial for maintaining clean and functioning code.

   To improve this situation, you should consider keeping the review.yml file intact or at least ensure the functionality provided by this workflow is replaced by another process. If you decide to keep the static check, ensure the file is restored with the intended settings.

   The YAML content should look something like this:

   name: reviewdog
   on: [pull_request]
   jobs:
     staticcheck:
       name: runner / staticcheck
       runs-on: ubuntu-latest
       steps:
         - uses: actions/checkout@v4
         - uses: reviewdog/action-staticcheck@v1
           with:
             github_token: ${{ secrets.github_token }}
             staticcheck_flags: "all,-ST1000"
             reporter: github-pr-review
             filter_mode: nofilter
             fail_on_error: true

2. Documentation: By deleting the workflow, any related documentation that references this process will become inaccurate, potentially misleading contributors. If the workflow is no longer needed, you might want to update any relevant documentation to reflect the current state of the project.

3. Error Handling: The removal of this workflow affects error handling in terms of code quality checks. Since the static analysis process is responsible for catching certain errors before they reach production, without it, there is a higher risk of bugs. Consider implementing equivalent error-handling practices or ensuring that other tools are in place to fill this gap.

To summarize, the crucial point here is that you need to maintain or replace the functionality provided by the static analysis checks to ensure code quality is upheld in your project.