Skip to content

Add description flag for dump mode #80

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025
Merged

Conversation

catatsuy
Copy link
Owner

This pull request introduces a new description flag for the dump mode in the CLI tool, allowing users to add a description of the repository when dumping its contents. The changes include updates to the command-line interface, the RunDump function, and the associated tests.

Key changes include:

CLI Enhancements:

  • Added a new description flag to the CLI for the dump mode to allow users to provide a description of the repository. (internal/cli/cli.go, README.md) [1] [2] [3]

Function Modifications:

  • Updated the RunDump function to accept an additional description parameter and include it in the output if provided. (internal/cli/dump.go) [1] [2]

Helper Functions:

  • Introduced a new unescapeString function to process escape sequences in the description string. (internal/cli/dump.go)

Test Updates:

  • Modified tests for the RunDump function to accommodate the new description parameter. (internal/cli/dump_test.go) [1] [2] [3] [4]

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Automatic Review

The code changes include the addition of a new -description flag and its handling in the RunDump function. Here are the issues identified based on the criteria provided:

Completeness
The implementation introduces the -description flag but does not validate the input for the descriptive text. This can potentially lead to unexpected behavior if the description contains special characters or is excessively long. It would be prudent to impose some constraints on the description input.

Suggestion: Implement input validation to ensure the description is within expected bounds (e.g., length check). For example:

if len(description) > 256 {
    return fmt.Errorf("description is too long, maximum length is 256 characters")
}

Testing
While there is a test case for the newly added functionality (TestRunDump_WithDescription), it is crucial to also test edge cases such as an empty description, extremely long descriptions, or special characters that may not be handled properly.

Suggestion: Add more unit tests to handle various scenarios, such as:

func TestRunDump_WithEmptyDescription(t *testing.T) {
    repoPath := "testdata/repo"
    outStream, errStream, inputStream := new(bytes.Buffer), new(bytes.Buffer), new(bytes.Buffer)
    cli := NewCLI(outStream, errStream, inputStream, nil, false)

    err := cli.RunDump(repoPath, "")
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("RunDump failed with empty description: %v", err)
    }
    // Optionally check output to ensure it behaves as expected
}

Documentation
While the changes to the README provide some clarity about the new -description flag, it would be beneficial to include a section explaining any constraints or special formatting expected in the description.

Suggestion: Enhance the documentation to mention character limits or potential issues with special characters. For example:

The `-description` flag allows you to provide a specific description of the repository when using the dump mode. This description should be concise (maximum length of 256 characters) and may not include certain special characters to avoid formatting issues.

By addressing these areas, the code and documentation can improve in terms of robustness, usability, and clarity, ensuring that users have a better experience and that edge cases are handled appropriately.

@catatsuy catatsuy merged commit 41805ad into main Jan 25, 2025
5 checks passed
@catatsuy catatsuy deleted the feature-add-description-to-dump branch January 25, 2025 08:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant