Skip to content

Update auto-review.yml to use pull request base ref for diffs #66

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

catatsuy
Copy link
Owner

@catatsuy catatsuy commented Sep 9, 2024

This pull request includes updates to the .github/workflows/auto-review.yml file to improve the accuracy of the diff comparisons in the automated review process.

Changes to diff comparisons:

  • Updated the diff_output command to use the base reference of the pull request instead of the default branch of the repository. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml, .github/workflows/auto-review.ymlL23-R23)
  • Modified the bento -review command to also use the base reference of the pull request for more accurate review content. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml, .github/workflows/auto-review.ymlL40-R40)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Automatic Review

The code update shows a change in the GitHub Actions workflow configuration, specifically related to how it identifies the branch for reviewing diffs. Here are some identified issues:

Bugs: The modification from using ${{ github.event.repository.default_branch }} to ${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }} is generally appropriate when dealing with pull requests. However, it's essential to ensure that this workflow will execute only on pull request events; otherwise, it may lead to discrepancies in the behavior of the workflow, especially if it runs on other triggers.

To mitigate this, ensure that the workflow is set to trigger only on pull request events. If that's not the case, consider adding appropriate checks or conditions to prevent unexpected behavior.

Code Style: The use of command substitution with $(...) is generally preferred over backticks in shell scripts for better readability, which is already in place to some extent. However, maintain consistent style in documentation comments and output messages could enhance clarity.

You might want to include a comment at the top of the script section explaining the rationale behind using the pull request base branch.

For instance:

# Get the diff between the current PR branch and its base to perform a review
diff_output=$(git diff origin/${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}...HEAD)

Error Handling: There is limited error handling in the script. If the git diff command fails for any reason (e.g., network issues, invalid branch references), the workflow will not handle this gracefully. It's often a good practice to check the exit status of commands and act accordingly.

Consider adding error handling like this:

diff_output=$(git diff origin/${{ github.event.pull_request.base.ref }}...HEAD) || {
    echo "Error occurred while getting the diff."
    exit 1
}

These changes would improve robustness, ensure clarity, and enhance the overall reliability of the workflow script.

@catatsuy catatsuy merged commit 313e807 into main Sep 9, 2024
6 checks passed
@catatsuy catatsuy deleted the feature-update-auto-review-workflow-diff-reference branch September 9, 2024 03:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant