Skip to content

Add GitHub Actions workflow for automatic code review #59

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2024

Conversation

catatsuy
Copy link
Owner

@catatsuy catatsuy commented Sep 1, 2024

This pull request introduces an automated review process for pull requests using GitHub Actions. The workflow checks for differences in the code, runs a review using the Bento tool, and posts the review as a comment on the pull request if necessary.

Automated Review Workflow:

  • Workflow Configuration: Added a new workflow named Auto Review that triggers on pull request events. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml)
  • Job Setup: Configured the job to run on ubuntu-latest with permissions to write to pull requests and issues. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml)
  • Steps in the Job:
    • Checkout Code: Uses actions/checkout@v4 to check out the code with full history. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml)
    • Download Bento: Downloads and installs the Bento tool for code review. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml)
    • Check for Diffs: Checks for differences in the code and sets an environment variable to skip the review if there are no changes or if the diff is too large. (.github/workflows/auto-review.yml)
    • Run Review: Executes the Bento review if there are changes and stores the review content in

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2024

Automatic Review

The code you've provided is a GitHub Actions workflow for automated code review. Here are some potential issues identified in the relevant areas:

Performance:
The use of and to download and extract a binary might be slow depending on the network conditions. Additionally, relying on a potentially large binary download could slow down the overall job execution time.

Suggestion for Improvement:
Consider using an official package manager if available, or cache the binary within the workflow. This way, you can avoid downloading it every time the workflow is executed.

Example:

Error Handling:
The script does not handle potential errors that may occur during the download and extraction of the binary. For example, if the command fails, the workflow will proceed as if was installed correctly.

Suggestion for Improvement:
Add error handling to ensure the workflow fails gracefully if the binary download or installation fails.

Example:

Documentation:
There is a lack of comments or documentation outlining the purpose of each step in the workflow file. While the names of the steps are somewhat descriptive, additional comments would enhance readability and maintainability.

Suggestion for Improvement:
Add comments explaining the purpose or expected outcomes for each step in the workflow, especially for complex or non-obvious commands.

Example:

Consider addressing these issues for improving the robustness, performance, and maintainability of your GitHub Actions workflow.

@catatsuy catatsuy force-pushed the feature-add-auto-review-workflow branch 4 times, most recently from 2209f6b to 2eff6be Compare September 1, 2024 08:23
@catatsuy catatsuy force-pushed the feature-add-auto-review-workflow branch from 2eff6be to 7301494 Compare September 1, 2024 08:24
@catatsuy catatsuy merged commit 35018c0 into main Sep 1, 2024
5 checks passed
@catatsuy catatsuy deleted the feature-add-auto-review-workflow branch September 1, 2024 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant