First of all thanks for your work regarding this useful project 🙂

I'm wondering if there is a way to define a data type that uses a different data type as one if its parameters.

e.g.:

#@define
TypeA {
    fizz: String
    buzz: String
}

#@define
TypeB = {
    foo: TypeA
    bar: TypeA
}

cfg {
    typeB = TypeB
    additionalParam = String
}

Currently TypeB gets interpreted as :

  final case class TypeB(
    bar : java.lang.String,
    foo : java.lang.String
  )

This would be super helpful to avoid code duplication and make configuration data handling much easier.