Skip to content

Three-party handoff/Level 3 RPC support #597

@Semisol

Description

@Semisol

This issue is for tracking 3PH implementation status. This supersedes #160 as there have been significant changes to the 3PH protocol since that implementation.

Progress tracking

  • Rework of Network implementation, and updating schemas
  • Implementation of initial 3PH support
    • No embargoes
      • As a temporary solution, we may refuse to proceed with 3PH if we have outstanding promises.
      • This option can be disabled for testing purposes in certain environments, but E-order can be violated
    • No call result forwarding: This only handles capability transfers.
    • Updates to the test network to make it support 3PH, and test caases
  • 4+ party forwarding: If Network3PH.Forward allows it, Accept messages can be forwarded if there exists a longer chain of vats.
    • This should be done with the initial 3PH PR if possible.
  • Implementation of embargo support for 3PH
  • Three party call forwarding
    • This would be beneficial in less environments compared to 3PH.
    • New APIs will most likely be required and code rewrites.

Other considerations

  • We should consider offering a basic VatNetwork implementation that is stable, using hostnames as vat identifiers, and possibly with TLS.
  • Work to prevent possible DoS issues should be done, as some networks will be public

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions