-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37.8k
instance of 'mem pool' to 'mempool' #9029
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Makes sense, utACK |
Not the only one, please fix also the second one in |
I was once wondering if this should be changed to transaction pool, but I don't think it is feasible to change at this point. |
Yes, in retrospect that would have been a much better name. But everyone knows what a mempool is by now, changing it will just seed more confusion. Better to go with the least invasive change. |
ok- I changed that one in Can I squash commits using the GitHub web app? If not I can do it from my console but not until later this evening. I agree that mempool is kind of standard jargon, it's in the "Mastering Bitcoin" book by Andreas Antonopoulos for instance |
there was only one instance of 'mem pool' and not 'mempool', so I changed it to conform to the others
Squashed the commits |
1c3ecc7 instance of 'mem pool' to 'mempool' (S. Matthew English)
utACK On Thursday, 27 October 2016, Wladimir J. van der Laan <
|
there was only one instance of 'mem pool' and not 'mempool', so I changed it to conform to the others Github-Pull: bitcoin#9029 Rebased-From: 1c3ecc7
1c3ecc7 instance of 'mem pool' to 'mempool' (S. Matthew English)
1c3ecc7 instance of 'mem pool' to 'mempool' (S. Matthew English)
1c3ecc7 instance of 'mem pool' to 'mempool' (S. Matthew English)
there was only one instance of 'mem pool' and not 'mempool', so I changed it to conform to the others