Skip to content

Conversation

laanwj
Copy link
Member

@laanwj laanwj commented Jun 21, 2016

Did I forget any place?

One of #7678.

Mention ARM executables in the release process documentation
(these were introduced in bitcoin#8188).
As well as that Linux tarballs have changed name to contain an
architecture tuple, instead of `linux32`/`linux64`.
Also mention that `-debug` files should not be uploaded (these were
introduced in bitcoin#8167).
@laanwj laanwj added the Docs label Jun 21, 2016
@maflcko
Copy link
Member

maflcko commented Jun 21, 2016

utACK 877ad71. Will test when rc1 is out.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member Author

laanwj commented Jun 21, 2016

Also probably requires a change to the download page on bitcoin.org: bitcoin-dot-org/Bitcoin.org#1315

@laanwj laanwj force-pushed the 2016_06_release_process_arm branch from 877ad71 to 05f64c9 Compare June 21, 2016 12:59
@fanquake
Copy link
Member

Maybe add aarch64-linux-gnu to the host-platform-triplets list in depends/README.md? Otherwise ACK

@laanwj
Copy link
Member Author

laanwj commented Jun 22, 2016

Maybe add aarch64-linux-gnu to the host-platform-triplets list in depends/README.md?

Good idea.

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 06f40ef into bitcoin:master Jun 22, 2016
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2016
06f40ef depends: Mention aarch64 as common cross-compile target (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
05f64c9 doc: Mention Linux ARM builds in release notes (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
b7bf037 doc: Mention ARM executables in release process (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
@laanwj laanwj mentioned this pull request Jul 11, 2016
16 tasks
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants