Skip to content

Conversation

luke-jr
Copy link
Member

@luke-jr luke-jr commented Oct 20, 2016

At least boost 1.56 (Gentoo amd64 stable) is missing operator!=

Copy link
Contributor

@jonasschnelli jonasschnelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 7942d31

luke-jr added a commit to bitcoinknots/bitcoin that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2016
Copy link
Contributor

@paveljanik paveljanik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 7942d31

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Oct 20, 2016

I'm not quite convinced that we really need to do these consistency checks all the time, but utACK if it happens to fix building on older boost.

@laanwj laanwj merged commit 7942d31 into bitcoin:master Oct 20, 2016
laanwj added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2016
…, which is only in newer boost versions

7942d31 RPC: importmulti: Avoid using boost::variant::operator!=, which is only in newer boost versions (Luke Dashjr)
@laanwj laanwj mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2016
codablock pushed a commit to codablock/dash that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2018
…rator!=, which is only in newer boost versions

7942d31 RPC: importmulti: Avoid using boost::variant::operator!=, which is only in newer boost versions (Luke Dashjr)
andvgal pushed a commit to energicryptocurrency/gen2-energi that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
…rator!=, which is only in newer boost versions

7942d31 RPC: importmulti: Avoid using boost::variant::operator!=, which is only in newer boost versions (Luke Dashjr)
CryptoCentric pushed a commit to absolute-community/absolute that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2019
…rator!=, which is only in newer boost versions

7942d31 RPC: importmulti: Avoid using boost::variant::operator!=, which is only in newer boost versions (Luke Dashjr)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants