Skip to content

Conversation

sipa
Copy link
Member

@sipa sipa commented Nov 10, 2014

To avoid the need for libsecp256k1 to expose such functionality.

To avoid the need for libsecp256k1 to expose such functionality.
@gmaxwell
Copy link
Contributor

ACK. I prefer this approach.

@laanwj
Copy link
Member

laanwj commented Nov 12, 2014

Sure, if we only need this in the tests, the proper place is the tests. ACK.

@laanwj laanwj added the Tests label Nov 12, 2014
@sipa sipa merged commit f4e0aef into bitcoin:master Nov 12, 2014
sipa added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2014
f4e0aef Do signature-s negation inside the tests (Pieter Wuille)
@bitcoin bitcoin locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 8, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants