The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

Code Coverage & Benchmarks

For details see: https://corecheck.dev/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls/33233.

Reviews

See the guideline for information on the review process.

If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.

lgtm ACK 2a815d1

Code review ACK 2a815d1

Maybe we want to keep this PR open a little longer in case there are other small documentation updates like this? Seems fine to merge now though if preferred.

May also want to include "doc:" in PR title

Another little thing I noticed is that italics should be removed from these files in files.md since they are now included in binary releases:

Maybe we want to keep this PR open a little longer in case there are other small documentation updates like this?

Yes, I was assuming there would be more things showing up over the next few days. Though I can always open another PR.

Also, on Fedora you need both packages, see maflcko/b-c-nightly@14d34ab.

Suggested patch:

diff --git a/doc/build-unix.md b/doc/build-unix.md
index 38b4496687..04f757ba52 100644
--- a/doc/build-unix.md
+++ b/doc/build-unix.md
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ User-Space, Statically Defined Tracing (USDT) dependencies:
 
 Cap'n Proto is needed for IPC functionality (see [multiprocess.md](multiprocess.md)):
 
-    sudo dnf install capnproto
+    sudo dnf install capnproto capnproto-devel
 
 Compile with `-DENABLE_IPC=OFF` if you do not need IPC functionality.
 

You'll also need to add the capnp install instructions for Alpine and Arch in build-unix.md.

Arch instruction taken from: https://capnproto.org/install.html

For Alpine I added capnproto and capnproto-dev since they both exist, but didn't test if the latter is needed.

For Alpine I added capnproto and capnproto-dev since they both exist, but didn't test if the latter is needed.

dev installs the other: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6500081345495040?logs=install#L0

lgtm ACK de65c86

@jonatack done, although I wasn't expecting there to be only doc changes.

If there are more changes, there can be more PRs. We can fixup the docs now, and open more PRs when needed.