Skip to content

Conversation

justinvforvendetta
Copy link

No description provided.

Comment on lines 82 to 84
* limbs are in range (-2^30,2^30), this cannot overflow an int32_t. Note that the right
* shifts below are signed sign-extending shifts (see assumptions.h for tests that that is
* shifts below are signed sign-extending shifts (see assumptions.h for tests that verify that is
* indeed the behavior of the right shift operator). */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a native speaker, but the current version seems easier to parse. Maybe "... for tests that this is indeed ...".

Copy link
Contributor

@real-or-random real-or-random Aug 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NACK on this change. I think the current version on master is perfectly fine and readable, and so there's no reason to bother with it. Neither your first suggestion nor your updated suggestion seems natural to me. I feel that "that" should not be omitted here. If your grammar checker complains about a repeated word, then that's a false positive. (And I don't think Jonas' suggestion is an improvement either.)

@real-or-random real-or-random added tweak/refactor meta/development processes, conventions, developer documentation, etc. labels Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meta/development processes, conventions, developer documentation, etc. tweak/refactor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants