Skip to content

Conversation

glozow
Copy link
Member

@glozow glozow commented Apr 7, 2025

  • release notes, including a few edits
  • RPC docs
  • announcement, including a note about security advisories

@glozow glozow force-pushed the 2025-04-29-ann branch 2 times, most recently from 73b2e1c to c053a4c Compare April 7, 2025 19:46
@achow101
Copy link
Member

CI is failing, probably want that to be green before merging, otherwise this won't deploy properly.

@glozow glozow force-pushed the 2025-04-29-ann branch 2 times, most recently from b6780de to ab41102 Compare April 14, 2025 13:17

### Tools and Utilities

- A new tool [`utxo_to_sqlite.py`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v29.0/contrib/utxo-tools/utxo_to_sqlite.py)
Copy link
Member Author

@glozow glozow Apr 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was the build error so I changed the link.

Edit: Diff can be checked with git diff ../bitcoin/doc/release-notes.md _releases/29.0.md

@glozow glozow marked this pull request as ready for review April 14, 2025 18:23
@glozow
Copy link
Member Author

glozow commented Apr 14, 2025

Bins are up, added magnet link. Ready for review.

@achow101
Copy link
Member

ACK 5c45a40

Copy link
Member

@darosior darosior left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(Feel free to ignore the nits)

Comment on lines +126 to +130
miners will not accidentally violate the timewarp rule. (#31376, #31600)
As a reminder, it's important that any software which uses the `getblocktemplate`
RPC takes these values into account (either `curtime` or `mintime` is fine).
Relying only on a clock can lead to invalid blocks under some circumstances,
especially once a timewarp fix is deployed. (#31600)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: indentation seems off?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it renders the same, so just kept the indentation as is.

Comment on lines 136 to 138
`scanblocks` to lessen the need for additional indexing programs. (#30708)


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: extraneous linebreak

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed

Comment on lines 19 to 20
## Link should be enclosed in quotes and start with: "magnet:?
optional_magnetlink: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c2ebe360dc7e85d9850196ea57712c8ddffbcd59&dn=bitcoin-core-29.0&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexplodie.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcoincore.org%2Fbin%2F
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment states link should be in quotes?

Suggested change
## Link should be enclosed in quotes and start with: "magnet:?
optional_magnetlink: magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c2ebe360dc7e85d9850196ea57712c8ddffbcd59&dn=bitcoin-core-29.0&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexplodie.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcoincore.org%2Fbin%2F
## Link should be enclosed in quotes and start with: "magnet:?
optional_magnetlink: "magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c2ebe360dc7e85d9850196ea57712c8ddffbcd59&dn=bitcoin-core-29.0&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.openbittorrent.com%3A80&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.coppersurfer.tk%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.leechers-paradise.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexplodie.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.torrent.eu.org%3A451%2Fannounce&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.bitcoin.sprovoost.nl%3A6969&ws=http%3A%2F%2Fbitcoincore.org%2Fbin%2F"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added

Comment on lines +26 to +27
disclosed. Additionally, low severity vulnerabilities affecting versions 28.x
(if any) will be disclosed.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we say "in 2 weeks" or even give a specific date if you expect to publish today?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's say 2 weeks. Sometimes we miss intended deadlines when we don't have people to review stuff.

Copy link
Member

@darosior darosior left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK ddc2041

Looks good to me. Just haven't checked the RPC docs.

@achow101
Copy link
Member

ACK ddc2041

@achow101 achow101 merged commit df4aec7 into bitcoin-core:master Apr 14, 2025
2 checks passed
@glozow glozow deleted the 2025-04-29-ann branch April 14, 2025 23:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants