Remove workaround for black vs pydocstyle D202 #2870
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See psf/black#709 and PyCQA/pydocstyle#395 pydocstyle v5.0.0 (and thus flake8 D202) was relaxed to accept the blank lines added by black.
|
Looks like I should fix the comment to be PyCQA/pydocstyle#426 instead |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2870 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.75% 84.18% +0.43%
==========================================
Files 318 318
Lines 49936 50126 +190
==========================================
+ Hits 41822 42201 +379
+ Misses 8114 7925 -189
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See psf/black#709 and PyCQA/pydocstyle#395 - pydocstyle v5.0.0 (and thus flake8 D202) was relaxed to accept the blank lines added by black.
I hereby agree to dual licence this and any previous contributions under both
the Biopython License Agreement AND the BSD 3-Clause License.
I have read the
CONTRIBUTING.rstfile, have runflake8locally, andunderstand that AppVeyor and TravisCI will be used to confirm the Biopython unit
tests and style checks pass with these changes.
I have added my name to the alphabetical contributors listings in the files
NEWS.rstandCONTRIB.rstas part of this pull request, am listedalready, or do not wish to be listed. (This acknowledgement is optional.)