There is a race between block group removal and block group creation
when the removal is completed by a task running fitrim or scrub. When
this happens we end up failing the block group creation with an error
-EEXIST since we attempt to insert a duplicate block group item key
in the extent tree. That results in a transaction abort.

The race happens like this:

1) Task A is doing a fitrim, and at btrfs_trim_block_group() it freezes
   block group X with btrfs_freeze_block_group() (until very recently
   that was named btrfs_get_block_group_trimming());

2) Task B starts removing block group X, either because it's now unused
   or due to relocation for example. So at btrfs_remove_block_group(),
   while holding the chunk mutex and the block group's lock, it sets
   the 'removed' flag of the block group and it sets the local variable
   'remove_em' to false, because the block group is currently frozen
   (its 'frozen' counter is > 0, until very recently this counter was
   named 'trimming');

3) Task B unlocks the block group and the chunk mutex;

4) Task A is done trimming the block group and unfreezes the block group
   by calling btrfs_unfreeze_block_group() (until very recently this was
   named btrfs_put_block_group_trimming()). In this function we lock the
   block group and set the local variable 'cleanup' to true because we
   were able to decrement the block group's 'frozen' counter down to 0 and
   the flag 'removed' is set in the block group.

   Since 'cleanup' is set to true, it locks the chunk mutex and removes
   the extent mapping representing the block group from the mapping tree;

5) Task C allocates a new block group Y and it picks up the logical address
   that block group X had as the logical address for Y, because X was the
   block group with the highest logical address and now the second block
   group with the highest logical address, the last in the fs mapping tree,
   ends at an offset corresponding to block group X's logical address (this
   logical address selection is done at volumes.c:find_next_chunk()).

   At this point the new block group Y does not have yet its item added
   to the extent tree (nor the corresponding device extent items and
   chunk item in the device and chunk trees). The new group Y is added to
   the list of pending block groups in the transaction handle;

6) Before task B proceeds to removing the block group item for block
   group X from the extent tree, which has a key matching:

   (X logical offset, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY, length)

   task C while ending its transaction handle calls
   btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), which finds block group Y and
   tries to insert the block group item for Y into the exten tree, which
   fails with -EEXIST since logical offset is the same that X had and
   task B hasn't yet deleted the key from the extent tree.
   This failure results in a transaction abort, producing a stack like
   the following:

------------[ cut here ]------------
 BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17)
 WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 19736 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2074 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1eb/0x260 [btrfs]
 Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq (...)
 CPU: 2 PID: 19736 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G        W         5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1eb/0x260 [btrfs]
 Code: ff ff ff 48 8b 55 50 f0 48 (...)
 RSP: 0018:ffffa4160a1c7d58 EFLAGS: 00010286
 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff961581909d98 RCX: 0000000000000000
 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffb3d63990 RDI: 0000000000000001
 RBP: ffff9614f3356a58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
 R10: ffff9615b65b0040 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff961581909c10
 R13: ffff9615b0c32000 R14: ffff9614f3356ab0 R15: ffff9614be779000
 FS:  00007f2ce2841e80(0000) GS:ffff9615bae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000555f18780000 CR3: 0000000131d34005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Call Trace:
  btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x398/0x4e0 [btrfs]
  btrfs_commit_transaction+0xd0/0xc50 [btrfs]
  ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1e/0x50 [btrfs]
  ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20
  iterate_supers+0xdb/0x180
  ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0
  __ia32_sys_sync+0xa/0x10
  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
 RIP: 0033:0x7f2ce1d4d5b7
 Code: 83 c4 08 48 3d 01 (...)
 RSP: 002b:00007ffd8b558c58 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000002c RCX: 00007f2ce1d4d5b7
 RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 00000000186ba07b RDI: 000000000000002c
 RBP: 0000555f17b9e520 R08: 0000000000000012 R09: 000000000000ce00
 R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000032
 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffd8b558cd0 R15: 0000555f1798ec20
 irq event stamp: 0
 hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020
 softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020
 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
 ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a9c ]---

Fix this simply by making btrfs_remove_block_group() remove the block
group's item from the extent tree before it flags the block group as
removed. Also make the free space deletion from the free space tree
before flagging the block group as removed, to avoid a similar race
with adding and removing free space entries for the free space tree.

Fixes: 0421682 ("Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When running relocation of a data block group while scrub is running in
parallel, it is possible that the relocation will fail and abort the
current transaction with an -EINVAL error:

   [134243.988595] BTRFS info (device sdc): found 14 extents, stage: move data extents
   [134243.999871] ------------[ cut here ]------------
   [134244.000741] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -22)
   [134244.001692] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 26954 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1071 __btrfs_cow_block+0x6a7/0x790 [btrfs]
   [134244.003380] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq (...)
   [134244.012577] CPU: 0 PID: 26954 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W         5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5
   [134244.014162] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
   [134244.016184] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_cow_block+0x6a7/0x790 [btrfs]
   [134244.017151] Code: 48 c7 c7 (...)
   [134244.020549] RSP: 0018:ffffa41607863888 EFLAGS: 00010286
   [134244.021515] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9614bdfe09c8 RCX: 0000000000000000
   [134244.022822] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffb3d63980 RDI: 0000000000000001
   [134244.024124] RBP: ffff961589e8c000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
   [134244.025424] R10: ffffffffc0ae5955 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614bd530d08
   [134244.026725] R13: ffff9614ced41b88 R14: ffff9614bdfe2a48 R15: 0000000000000000
   [134244.028024] FS:  00007f29b63c08c0(0000) GS:ffff9615ba600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
   [134244.029491] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
   [134244.030560] CR2: 00007f4eb339b000 CR3: 0000000130d6e006 CR4: 00000000003606f0
   [134244.031997] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
   [134244.033153] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
   [134244.034484] Call Trace:
   [134244.034984]  btrfs_cow_block+0x12b/0x2b0 [btrfs]
   [134244.035859]  do_relocation+0x30b/0x790 [btrfs]
   [134244.036681]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
   [134244.037460]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
   [134244.038235]  relocate_tree_blocks+0x37b/0x730 [btrfs]
   [134244.039245]  relocate_block_group+0x388/0x770 [btrfs]
   [134244.040228]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x161/0x2e0 [btrfs]
   [134244.041323]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x36/0x110 [btrfs]
   [134244.041345]  btrfs_balance+0xc06/0x1860 [btrfs]
   [134244.043382]  ? btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x27c/0x310 [btrfs]
   [134244.045586]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x1ed/0x310 [btrfs]
   [134244.045611]  btrfs_ioctl+0x1880/0x3760 [btrfs]
   [134244.049043]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0
   [134244.049838]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
   [134244.050587]  ? __handle_mm_fault+0x11b3/0x14b0
   [134244.051417]  ? ksys_ioctl+0x92/0xb0
   [134244.052070]  ksys_ioctl+0x92/0xb0
   [134244.052701]  ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
   [134244.053511]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   [134244.054206]  do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280
   [134244.054891]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
   [134244.055819] RIP: 0033:0x7f29b51c9dd7
   [134244.056491] Code: 00 00 00 (...)
   [134244.059767] RSP: 002b:00007ffcccc1dd08 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
   [134244.061168] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f29b51c9dd7
   [134244.062474] RDX: 00007ffcccc1dda0 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000003
   [134244.063771] RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 00005565cea4b000 R09: 0000000000000000
   [134244.065032] R10: 0000000000000541 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffcccc2060a
   [134244.066327] R13: 00007ffcccc1dda0 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: 00007ffcccc1dec0
   [134244.067626] irq event stamp: 0
   [134244.068202] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
   [134244.069351] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020
   [134244.070909] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020
   [134244.072392] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
   [134244.073432] ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a99 ]---

The -EINVAL error comes from the following chain of function calls:

  __btrfs_cow_block() <-- aborts the transaction
    btrfs_reloc_cow_block()
      replace_file_extents()
        get_new_location() <-- returns -EINVAL

When relocating a data block group, for each allocated extent of the block
group, we preallocate another extent (at prealloc_file_extent_cluster()),
associated with the data relocation inode, and then dirty all its pages.
These preallocated extents have, and must have, the same size that extents
from the data block group being relocated have.

Later before we start the relocation stage that updates pointers (bytenr
field of file extent items) to point to the the new extents, we trigger
writeback for the data relocation inode. The expectation is that writeback
will write the pages to the previously preallocated extents, that it
follows the NOCOW path. That is generally the case, however, if a scrub
is running it may have turned the block group that contains those extents
into RO mode, in which case writeback falls back to the COW path.

However in the COW path instead of allocating exactly one extent with the
expected size, the allocator may end up allocating several smaller extents
due to free space fragmentation - because we tell it at cow_file_range()
that the minimum allocation size can match the filesystem's sector size.
This later breaks the relocation's expectation that an extent associated
to a file extent item in the data relocation inode has the same size as
the respective extent pointed by a file extent item in another tree - in
this case the extent to which the relocation inode poins to is smaller,
causing relocation.c:get_new_location() to return -EINVAL.

For example, if we are relocating a data block group X that has a logical
address of X and the block group has an extent allocated at the logical
address X + 128KiB with a size of 64KiB:

1) At prealloc_file_extent_cluster() we allocate an extent for the data
   relocation inode with a size of 64KiB and associate it to the file
   offset 128KiB (X + 128KiB - X) of the data relocation inode. This
   preallocated extent was allocated at block group Z;

2) A scrub running in parallel turns block group Z into RO mode and
   starts scrubing its extents;

3) Relocation triggers writeback for the data relocation inode;

4) When running delalloc (btrfs_run_delalloc_range()), we try first the
   NOCOW path because the data relocation inode has BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC
   set in its flags. However, because block group Z is in RO mode, the
   NOCOW path (run_delalloc_nocow()) falls back into the COW path, by
   calling cow_file_range();

5) At cow_file_range(), in the first iteration of the while loop we call
   btrfs_reserve_extent() to allocate a 64KiB extent and pass it a minimum
   allocation size of 4KiB (fs_info->sectorsize). Due to free space
   fragmentation, btrfs_reserve_extent() ends up allocating two extents
   of 32KiB each, each one on a different iteration of that while loop;

6) Writeback of the data relocation inode completes;

7) Relocation proceeds and ends up at relocation.c:replace_file_extents(),
   with a leaf which has a file extent item that points to the data extent
   from block group X, that has a logical address (bytenr) of X + 128KiB
   and a size of 64KiB. Then it calls get_new_location(), which does a
   lookup in the data relocation tree for a file extent item starting at
   offset 128KiB (X + 128KiB - X) and belonging to the data relocation
   inode. It finds a corresponding file extent item, however that item
   points to an extent that has a size of 32KiB, which doesn't match the
   expected size of 64KiB, resuling in -EINVAL being returned from this
   function and propagated up to __btrfs_cow_block(), which aborts the
   current transaction.

To fix this make sure that at cow_file_range() when we call the allocator
we pass it a minimum allocation size corresponding the desired extent size
if the inode belongs to the data relocation tree, otherwise pass it the
filesystem's sector size as the minimum allocation size.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

…parallel

When balance and scrub are running in parallel it is possible to end up
with an underflow of the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info
object, which triggers a warning like the following:

   [134243.793196] BTRFS info (device sdc): relocating block group 1104150528 flags data
   [134243.806891] ------------[ cut here ]------------
   [134243.807561] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26884 at fs/btrfs/space-info.h:125 btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x1da/0x280 [btrfs]
   [134243.808819] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor (...)
   [134243.815779] CPU: 1 PID: 26884 Comm: kworker/u8:8 Tainted: G        W         5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5
   [134243.816944] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
   [134243.818389] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-108483)
   [134243.819186] RIP: 0010:btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x1da/0x280 [btrfs]
   [134243.819963] Code: 0b f2 85 (...)
   [134243.822271] RSP: 0018:ffffa4160aae7510 EFLAGS: 00010287
   [134243.822929] RAX: 000000000000c000 RBX: ffff96159a8c1000 RCX: 0000000000000000
   [134243.823816] RDX: 0000000000008000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff96158067a810
   [134243.824742] RBP: ffff96158067a800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
   [134243.825636] R10: ffff961501432a40 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000000c000
   [134243.826532] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffffffffffff4000 R15: ffff96158067a810
   [134243.827432] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9615baa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
   [134243.828451] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
   [134243.829184] CR2: 000055bd7e414000 CR3: 00000001077be004 CR4: 00000000003606e0
   [134243.830083] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
   [134243.830975] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
   [134243.831867] Call Trace:
   [134243.832211]  find_free_extent+0x4a0/0x16c0 [btrfs]
   [134243.832846]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0x91/0x180 [btrfs]
   [134243.833487]  cow_file_range+0x12d/0x490 [btrfs]
   [134243.834080]  fallback_to_cow+0x82/0x1b0 [btrfs]
   [134243.834689]  ? release_extent_buffer+0x121/0x170 [btrfs]
   [134243.835370]  run_delalloc_nocow+0x33f/0xa30 [btrfs]
   [134243.836032]  btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x1ea/0x6d0 [btrfs]
   [134243.836725]  ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x221/0x250 [btrfs]
   [134243.837450]  writepage_delalloc+0xe8/0x150 [btrfs]
   [134243.838059]  __extent_writepage+0xe8/0x4c0 [btrfs]
   [134243.838674]  extent_write_cache_pages+0x237/0x530 [btrfs]
   [134243.839364]  extent_writepages+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs]
   [134243.839946]  do_writepages+0x23/0x80
   [134243.840401]  __writeback_single_inode+0x59/0x700
   [134243.841006]  writeback_sb_inodes+0x267/0x5f0
   [134243.841548]  __writeback_inodes_wb+0x87/0xe0
   [134243.842091]  wb_writeback+0x382/0x590
   [134243.842574]  ? wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0
   [134243.843030]  wb_workfn+0x4a2/0x6c0
   [134243.843468]  process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0
   [134243.843978]  worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0
   [134243.844452]  ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0
   [134243.844981]  kthread+0x103/0x140
   [134243.845400]  ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
   [134243.846030]  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
   [134243.846494] irq event stamp: 0
   [134243.846892] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
   [134243.847682] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020
   [134243.848687] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020
   [134243.849913] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
   [134243.850698] ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a96 ]---
   [134243.851335] ------------[ cut here ]------------

When relocating a data block group, for each extent allocated in the
block group we preallocate another extent with the same size for the
data relocation inode (we do it at prealloc_file_extent_cluster()).
We reserve space by calling btrfs_check_data_free_space(), which ends
up incrementing the data space_info's bytes_may_use counter, and
then call btrfs_prealloc_file_range() to allocate the extent, which
always decrements the bytes_may_use counter by the same amount.

The expectation is that writeback of the data relocation inode always
follows a NOCOW path, by writing into the preallocated extents. However,
when starting writeback we might end up falling back into the COW path,
because the block group that contains the preallocated extent was turned
into RO mode by a scrub running in parallel. The COW path then calls the
extent allocator which ends up calling btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(), and
this function decrements the bytes_may_use counter of the data space_info
object by an amount corresponding to the size of the allocated extent,
despite we haven't previously incremented it. When the counter currently
has a value smaller then the allocated extent we reset the counter to 0
and emit a warning, otherwise we just decrement it and slowly mess up
with this counter which is crucial for space reservation, the end result
can be granting reserved space to tasks when there isn't really enough
free space, and having the tasks fail later in critical places where
error handling consists of a transaction abort or hitting a BUG_ON().

Fix this by making sure that if we fallback to the COW path for a data
relocation inode, we increment the bytes_may_use counter of the data
space_info object. The COW path will then decrement it at
btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() on success or through its error handling part
by a call to extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() (which ends up calling
btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() that does the decrement operation) in case
of an error.

Test case btrfs/061 from fstests could sporadically trigger this.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This brings back an optimization that commit e678934 ("btrfs:
Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans") removed, but in
a different form. So it's almost equivalent to a revert.

That commit removed an optimization where we avoid locking a root's
log_mutex when there is no log tree created in the current transaction.
The affected code path is triggered through unlink operations.

That commit was based on the assumption that the optimization was not
necessary because we used to have the following checks when the patch
was authored:

  int btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log(...)
  {
        (...)
        if (dir->logged_trans < trans->transid)
            return 0;

        ret = join_running_log_trans(root);
        (...)
   }

   int btrfs_del_inode_ref_in_log(...)
   {
        (...)
        if (inode->logged_trans < trans->transid)
            return 0;

        ret = join_running_log_trans(root);
        (...)
   }

However before that patch was merged, another patch was merged first which
replaced those checks because they were buggy.

That other patch corresponds to commit 803f0f6 ("Btrfs: fix fsync
not persisting dentry deletions due to inode evictions"). The assumption
that if the logged_trans field of an inode had a smaller value then the
current transaction's generation (transid) meant that the inode was not
logged in the current transaction was only correct if the inode was not
evicted and reloaded in the current transaction. So the corresponding bug
fix changed those checks and replaced them with the following helper
function:

  static bool inode_logged(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
                           struct btrfs_inode *inode)
  {
        if (inode->logged_trans == trans->transid)
                return true;

        if (inode->last_trans == trans->transid &&
            test_bit(BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC, &inode->runtime_flags) &&
            !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_LOG_RECOVERING, &trans->fs_info->flags))
                return true;

        return false;
  }

So if we have a subvolume without a log tree in the current transaction
(because we had no fsyncs), every time we unlink an inode we can end up
trying to lock the log_mutex of the root through join_running_log_trans()
twice, once for the inode being unlinked (by btrfs_del_inode_ref_in_log())
and once for the parent directory (with btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log()).

This means if we have several unlink operations happening in parallel for
inodes in the same subvolume, and the those inodes and/or their parent
inode were changed in the current transaction, we end up having a lot of
contention on the log_mutex.

The test robots from intel reported a -30.7% performance regression for
a REAIM test after commit e678934 ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check
from join_running_log_trans").

So just bring back the optimization to join_running_log_trans() where we
check first if a log root exists before trying to lock the log_mutex. This
is done by checking for a bit that is set on the root when a log tree is
created and removed when a log tree is freed (at transaction commit time).

Commit e678934 ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from
join_running_log_trans") was merged in the 5.4 merge window while commit
803f0f6 ("Btrfs: fix fsync not persisting dentry deletions due to
inode evictions") was merged in the 5.3 merge window. But the first
commit was actually authored before the second commit (May 23 2019 vs
June 19 2019).

Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200611090233.GL12456@shao2-debian/
Fixes: e678934 ("btrfs: Remove unnecessary check from join_running_log_trans")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we do a successful RWF_NOWAIT write we end up locking the snapshot lock
of the inode, through a call to check_can_nocow(), but we never unlock it.

This means the next attempt to create a snapshot on the subvolume will
hang forever.

Trivial reproducer:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ touch /mnt/foobar
  $ chattr +C /mnt/foobar
  $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" /mnt/foobar
  $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -S 0xfe 0 64K" /mnt/foobar

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap
    --> hangs

Fix this by unlocking the snapshot lock if check_can_nocow() returned
success.

Fixes: edf064e ("btrfs: nowait aio support")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we attempt to write to prealloc extent located after eof using a
RWF_NOWAIT write, we always fail with -EAGAIN.

We do actually check if we have an allocated extent for the write at
the start of btrfs_file_write_iter() through a call to check_can_nocow(),
but later when we go into the actual direct IO write path we simply
return -EAGAIN if the write starts at or beyond EOF.

Trivial to reproduce:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ touch /mnt/foo
  $ chattr +C /mnt/foo

  $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 64K" /mnt/foo
  wrote 65536/65536 bytes at offset 0
  64 KiB, 16 ops; 0.0004 sec (135.575 MiB/sec and 34707.1584 ops/sec)

  $ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 64K 1M" /mnt/foo

  $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -S 0xfe -b 64K 64K 64K" /mnt/foo
  pwrite: Resource temporarily unavailable

On xfs and ext4 the write succeeds, as expected.

Fix this by removing the wrong check at btrfs_direct_IO().

Fixes: edf064e ("btrfs: nowait aio support")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we attempt to do a RWF_NOWAIT write against a file range for which we
can only do NOCOW for a part of it, due to the existence of holes or
shared extents for example, we proceed with the write as if it were
possible to NOCOW the whole range.

Example:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ touch /mnt/sdj/bar
  $ chattr +C /mnt/sdj/bar

  $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 256K 0 256K" /mnt/bar
  wrote 262144/262144 bytes at offset 0
  256 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0003 sec (694.444 MiB/sec and 2777.7778 ops/sec)

  $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 64K 64K" /mnt/bar
  $ sync

  $ xfs_io -d -c "pwrite -N -V 1 -b 128K -S 0xfe 0 128K" /mnt/bar
  wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0
  128 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0007 sec (160.051 MiB/sec and 1280.4097 ops/sec)

This last write should fail with -EAGAIN since the file range from 64K to
128K is a hole. On xfs it fails, as expected, but on ext4 it currently
succeeds because apparently it is expensive to check if there are extents
allocated for the whole range, but I'll check with the ext4 people.

Fix the issue by checking if check_can_nocow() returns a number of
NOCOW'able bytes smaller then the requested number of bytes, and if it
does return -EAGAIN.

Fixes: edf064e ("btrfs: nowait aio support")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

A RWF_NOWAIT write is not supposed to wait on filesystem locks that can be
held for a long time or for ongoing IO to complete.

However when calling check_can_nocow(), if the inode has prealloc extents
or has the NOCOW flag set, we can block on extent (file range) locks
through the call to btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(). Such lock can
take a significant amount of time to be available. For example, a fiemap
task may be running, and iterating through the entire file range checking
all extents and doing backref walking to determine if they are shared,
or a readpage operation may be in progress.

Also at btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(), called by check_can_nocow(),
after locking the file range we wait for any existing ordered extent that
is in progress to complete. Another operation that can take a significant
amount of time and defeat the purpose of RWF_NOWAIT.

So fix this by trying to lock the file range and if it's currently locked
return -EAGAIN to user space. If we are able to lock the file range without
waiting and there is an ordered extent in the range, return -EAGAIN as
well, instead of waiting for it to complete. Finally, don't bother trying
to lock the snapshot lock of the root when attempting a RWF_NOWAIT write,
as that is only important for buffered writes.

Fixes: edf064e ("btrfs: nowait aio support")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

In btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info(), there is a classic case where kzalloc()
was incorrectly paired with kzfree(). According to David Sterba, there
isn't any sensitive information in the subvol_info that needs to be
cleared before freeing. So kzfree() isn't really needed, use kfree()
instead.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

…nel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "A number of fixes, located in two areas, one performance fix and one
  fixup for better integration with another patchset.

   - bug fixes in nowait aio:
       - fix snapshot creation hang after nowait-aio was used
       - fix failure to write to prealloc extent past EOF
       - don't block when extent range is locked

   - block group fixes:
       - relocation failure when scrub runs in parallel
       - refcount fix when removing fails
       - fix race between removal and creation
       - space accounting fixes

   - reinstante fast path check for log tree at unlink time, fixes
     performance drop up to 30% in REAIM

   - kzfree/kfree fixup to ease treewide patchset renaming kzfree"

* tag 'for-5.8-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: use kfree() in btrfs_ioctl_get_subvol_info()
  btrfs: fix RWF_NOWAIT writes blocking on extent locks and waiting for IO
  btrfs: fix RWF_NOWAIT write not failling when we need to cow
  btrfs: fix failure of RWF_NOWAIT write into prealloc extent beyond eof
  btrfs: fix hang on snapshot creation after RWF_NOWAIT write
  btrfs: check if a log root exists before locking the log_mutex on unlink
  btrfs: fix bytes_may_use underflow when running balance and scrub in parallel
  btrfs: fix data block group relocation failure due to concurrent scrub
  btrfs: fix race between block group removal and block group creation
  btrfs: fix a block group ref counter leak after failure to remove block group