Skip to content

Conversation

wdbaruni
Copy link
Member

@wdbaruni wdbaruni commented Jan 12, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Removed environment variable tracking for NODE_ID, JOB_NAME, and JOB_NAMESPACE in job execution.
    • Updated test cases to remove node-specific verifications and focus on partition-specific outputs.
    • Adjusted expected outputs in tests to reflect changes in environment variable priorities.

Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 12, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 12, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the environment variable handling in the Bacalhau system. Specifically, the changes remove the setting of NODE_ID, JOB_NAME, and JOB_NAMESPACE environment variables in the GetExecutionEnvVars function. Correspondingly, the test files have been updated to remove checks and references to these node-specific environment variables, indicating a shift towards a more partition-focused approach in job execution and testing.

Changes

File Change Summary
pkg/compute/envvars.go Removed environment variable assignments for NODE_ID, JOB_NAME, and JOB_NAMESPACE
pkg/test/devstack/partitioning_test.go Removed node-specific environment variable checks in multiple test methods (TestSinglePartition, TestMultiplePartitions, TestPartitionRetry)
pkg/compute/envvars_test.go Updated expected outputs in tests to remove BACALHAU_NODE_ID, BACALHAU_JOB_NAME, and BACALHAU_JOB_NAMESPACE; included BACALHAU_JOB_TYPE instead

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through the code we go,
Removing node vars with a cheerful glow
Partitions dance, no node in sight
Our testing realm now shines so bright!
Environment clean, simplicity's art 🌟

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pkg/compute/envvars_test.go (2)

76-78: LGTM! Consider enhancing the test case.

The test correctly verifies that task environment variables cannot override system environment variables. However, consider adding explicit assertions to verify that:

  1. Task-provided values for system environment variables are ignored
  2. All other task environment variables are passed through unchanged

Example enhancement:

 t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
     got := GetExecutionEnvVars(tt.execution)
     assert.Equal(t, tt.want, got)
+    // Explicitly verify system env var wasn't overridden
+    assert.Equal(t, "batch", got["BACALHAU_JOB_TYPE"], "system env var should not be overridden")
+    // Verify custom env vars were passed through
+    assert.Equal(t, "my-value", got["MY_VAR"], "custom env var should be passed through")
 })

Line range hint 13-133: Consider adding a test case for concurrent executions.

The test suite comprehensively covers various scenarios, but it might be valuable to add a test case that verifies environment variable isolation between concurrent executions of the same job. This would help ensure that environment variables are properly scoped and don't leak between executions.

Example test case to add:

{
    name: "concurrent executions of same job",
    execution: &models.Execution{
        ID:             "exec-2",
        JobID:          "job-1",
        PartitionIndex: 1,
        Job: &models.Job{
            Type:  "batch",
            Tasks: []*models.Task{{
                Name: "task-1",
                Env: map[string]string{
                    "PARTITION_SPECIFIC_VAR": "value-2",
                },
            }},
            Count: 2,
        },
    },
    want: map[string]string{
        "BACALHAU_EXECUTION_ID":    "exec-2",
        "BACALHAU_JOB_ID":          "job-1",
        "BACALHAU_JOB_TYPE":        "batch",
        "BACALHAU_PARTITION_INDEX": "1",
        "BACALHAU_PARTITION_COUNT": "2",
        "PARTITION_SPECIFIC_VAR":   "value-2",
    },
},
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d211503 and 50cd86a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/compute/envvars_test.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: testcontainers-suite / tests

@wdbaruni wdbaruni merged commit 5003f7d into main Jan 12, 2025
14 checks passed
@wdbaruni wdbaruni deleted the eng-532-remove-unnecessary-execution-env-vars branch January 12, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant