Skip to content

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This wasn't possible when expect was first introduced due to a change being required in upstream rust-lang/rust. That change rust-lang/rust#130025) has now rode enough trains to be in our MSRV, so we can expect missing docs now instead of just allowing it.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton requested review from a team as code owners March 12, 2025 15:17
@alexcrichton alexcrichton requested review from cfallin and dicej and removed request for a team March 12, 2025 15:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator cranelift:module pulley Issues related to the Pulley interpreter labels Mar 12, 2025
Copy link

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @fitzgen

This issue or pull request has been labeled: "cranelift", "cranelift:module", "pulley"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • fitzgen: pulley

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

This wasn't possible when `expect` was first introduced due to a change
being required in upstream rust-lang/rust. That change
rust-lang/rust#130025) has now rode enough trains to be in our MSRV, so
we can expect missing docs now instead of just allowing it.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton enabled auto-merge March 12, 2025 18:41
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 12, 2025
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit c3aa6a5 Mar 12, 2025
40 checks passed
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the expect-missing-docs branch March 12, 2025 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cranelift:module cranelift Issues related to the Cranelift code generator pulley Issues related to the Pulley interpreter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants