-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Make more code work with no_std. #407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
no_std support is still incomplete, but this patch takes care of the bulk of the straightforward parts.
yurydelendik
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2019
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/wasmtime
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2019
This commit moves away from idioms such as `alloc::` and `core::` as imports of standard data structures and types. Instead it migrates all crates to uniformly use `std::` for importing standard data structures and types. This also removes the `std` and `core` features from all crates to and removes any conditional checking for `feature = "std"` All of this support was previously added in bytecodealliance#407 in an effort to make wasmtime/cranelift "`no_std` compatible". Unfortunately though this change comes at a cost: * The usage of `alloc` and `core` isn't idiomatic. Especially trying to dual between types like `HashMap` from `std` as well as from `hashbrown` causes imports to be surprising in some cases. * Unfortunately there was no CI check that crates were `no_std`, so none of them actually were. Many crates still imported from `std` or depended on crates that used `std`. It's important to note, however, that **this does not mean that wasmtime will not run in embedded environments**. The style of the code today and idioms aren't ready in Rust to support this degree of multiplexing and makes it somewhat difficult to keep up with the style of `wasmtime`. Instead it's intended that embedded runtime support will be added as necessary. Currently only `std` is necessary to build `wasmtime`, and platforms that natively need to execute `wasmtime` will need to use a Rust target that supports `std`. Note though that not all of `std` needs to be supported, but instead much of it could be configured off to return errors, and `wasmtime` would be configured to gracefully handle errors. The goal of this PR is to move `wasmtime` back to idiomatic usage of features/`std`/imports/etc and help development in the short-term. Long-term when platform concerns arise (if any) they can be addressed by moving back to `no_std` crates (but fixing the issues mentioned above) or ensuring that the target in Rust has `std` available.
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/wasmtime
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2019
This commit moves away from idioms such as `alloc::` and `core::` as imports of standard data structures and types. Instead it migrates all crates to uniformly use `std::` for importing standard data structures and types. This also removes the `std` and `core` features from all crates to and removes any conditional checking for `feature = "std"` All of this support was previously added in bytecodealliance#407 in an effort to make wasmtime/cranelift "`no_std` compatible". Unfortunately though this change comes at a cost: * The usage of `alloc` and `core` isn't idiomatic. Especially trying to dual between types like `HashMap` from `std` as well as from `hashbrown` causes imports to be surprising in some cases. * Unfortunately there was no CI check that crates were `no_std`, so none of them actually were. Many crates still imported from `std` or depended on crates that used `std`. It's important to note, however, that **this does not mean that wasmtime will not run in embedded environments**. The style of the code today and idioms aren't ready in Rust to support this degree of multiplexing and makes it somewhat difficult to keep up with the style of `wasmtime`. Instead it's intended that embedded runtime support will be added as necessary. Currently only `std` is necessary to build `wasmtime`, and platforms that natively need to execute `wasmtime` will need to use a Rust target that supports `std`. Note though that not all of `std` needs to be supported, but instead much of it could be configured off to return errors, and `wasmtime` would be configured to gracefully handle errors. The goal of this PR is to move `wasmtime` back to idiomatic usage of features/`std`/imports/etc and help development in the short-term. Long-term when platform concerns arise (if any) they can be addressed by moving back to `no_std` crates (but fixing the issues mentioned above) or ensuring that the target in Rust has `std` available.
alexcrichton
added a commit
to alexcrichton/wasmtime
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2019
This commit moves away from idioms such as `alloc::` and `core::` as imports of standard data structures and types. Instead it migrates all crates to uniformly use `std::` for importing standard data structures and types. This also removes the `std` and `core` features from all crates to and removes any conditional checking for `feature = "std"` All of this support was previously added in bytecodealliance#407 in an effort to make wasmtime/cranelift "`no_std` compatible". Unfortunately though this change comes at a cost: * The usage of `alloc` and `core` isn't idiomatic. Especially trying to dual between types like `HashMap` from `std` as well as from `hashbrown` causes imports to be surprising in some cases. * Unfortunately there was no CI check that crates were `no_std`, so none of them actually were. Many crates still imported from `std` or depended on crates that used `std`. It's important to note, however, that **this does not mean that wasmtime will not run in embedded environments**. The style of the code today and idioms aren't ready in Rust to support this degree of multiplexing and makes it somewhat difficult to keep up with the style of `wasmtime`. Instead it's intended that embedded runtime support will be added as necessary. Currently only `std` is necessary to build `wasmtime`, and platforms that natively need to execute `wasmtime` will need to use a Rust target that supports `std`. Note though that not all of `std` needs to be supported, but instead much of it could be configured off to return errors, and `wasmtime` would be configured to gracefully handle errors. The goal of this PR is to move `wasmtime` back to idiomatic usage of features/`std`/imports/etc and help development in the short-term. Long-term when platform concerns arise (if any) they can be addressed by moving back to `no_std` crates (but fixing the issues mentioned above) or ensuring that the target in Rust has `std` available.
sunfishcode
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2019
* Migrate back to `std::` stylistically This commit moves away from idioms such as `alloc::` and `core::` as imports of standard data structures and types. Instead it migrates all crates to uniformly use `std::` for importing standard data structures and types. This also removes the `std` and `core` features from all crates to and removes any conditional checking for `feature = "std"` All of this support was previously added in #407 in an effort to make wasmtime/cranelift "`no_std` compatible". Unfortunately though this change comes at a cost: * The usage of `alloc` and `core` isn't idiomatic. Especially trying to dual between types like `HashMap` from `std` as well as from `hashbrown` causes imports to be surprising in some cases. * Unfortunately there was no CI check that crates were `no_std`, so none of them actually were. Many crates still imported from `std` or depended on crates that used `std`. It's important to note, however, that **this does not mean that wasmtime will not run in embedded environments**. The style of the code today and idioms aren't ready in Rust to support this degree of multiplexing and makes it somewhat difficult to keep up with the style of `wasmtime`. Instead it's intended that embedded runtime support will be added as necessary. Currently only `std` is necessary to build `wasmtime`, and platforms that natively need to execute `wasmtime` will need to use a Rust target that supports `std`. Note though that not all of `std` needs to be supported, but instead much of it could be configured off to return errors, and `wasmtime` would be configured to gracefully handle errors. The goal of this PR is to move `wasmtime` back to idiomatic usage of features/`std`/imports/etc and help development in the short-term. Long-term when platform concerns arise (if any) they can be addressed by moving back to `no_std` crates (but fixing the issues mentioned above) or ensuring that the target in Rust has `std` available. * Start filling out platform support doc
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
no_std support is still incomplete, but this patch takes care of the
bulk of the straightforward parts.