Skip to content

Add a few doc comments around validation, and fix some typos. #2154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2025

Conversation

erikrose
Copy link
Contributor

Breaking these free of an old attempt to fix #2063.

/// A function was found to be validate.
/// A function was found to be valid.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh "validate" here should have been "validated", the function isn't valid yet in this variant and it still needs to be validated.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed and push -f'd!

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 6a82bd7 Apr 22, 2025
32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tolerate duplicate imports when creating components
2 participants