Skip to content

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Now some previously-valid WIT packages are considered invalid, so just throw out such test cases instead of keeping them.



Now some previously-valid WIT packages are considered invalid, so just
throw out such test cases instead of keeping them.
@alexcrichton alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit aa2e152 Apr 14, 2025
32 checks passed
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the throw-out-more-cases branch April 14, 2025 22:58
alexcrichton added a commit to alexcrichton/wasm-tools that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
This commit fixes another fuzz bug after bytecodealliance#2141 didn't actually fix other
variations of the original bug. The fix here is to ensure that the
creation of `[method]name.name` basically just isn't possible because if
`name` is present, which is required for resources, then
`[method]name.name` is not allowed to be present.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
This commit fixes another fuzz bug after #2141 didn't actually fix other
variations of the original bug. The fix here is to ensure that the
creation of `[method]name.name` basically just isn't possible because if
`name` is present, which is required for resources, then
`[method]name.name` is not allowed to be present.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants