Skip to content

Conversation

cmark
Copy link
Member

@cmark cmark commented Feb 11, 2025

No description provided.

This is an alias to the `browse` operation type.
Add one extra test to verify that the former browse operation type still
working as a backward compatible operation type.
@cmark cmark requested review from apeteri and AAAlinaaa February 11, 2025 13:13
@cmark cmark self-assigned this Feb 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@apeteri apeteri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.72727% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.11%. Comparing base (265238d) to head (493c2c1).
Report is 7 commits behind head on 9.x.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tional/snowowl/core/branch/SearchMergeRequest.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...om/b2international/snowowl/core/identity/User.java 0.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ional/snowowl/core/repository/OptimizeRequest.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...tore/request/EvaluateQueryRefSetMemberRequest.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
.../datastore/request/EvaluateQueryRefSetRequest.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
.../reasoner/request/ClassificationSearchRequest.java 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                9.x    #1361   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     64.10%   64.11%           
- Complexity    12624    12627    +3     
=========================================
  Files          1614     1614           
  Lines         57334    57336    +2     
  Branches       5637     5638    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          36755    36759    +4     
  Misses        18233    18233           
+ Partials       2346     2344    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cmark cmark merged commit 32db033 into 9.x Feb 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@cmark cmark deleted the improvement/SO-6375-read-alias-permission-op branch February 11, 2025 16:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants