Skip to content

fix: Flaky organization service test by adding unique slug while org creation #40252

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025
Merged

fix: Flaky organization service test by adding unique slug while org creation #40252

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 15, 2025

Conversation

abhvsn
Copy link
Contributor

@abhvsn abhvsn commented Apr 15, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated organization-related test cases to include a randomly generated slug for each organization instance.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The test cases in the OrganizationServiceCETest class have been updated to assign a slug value to Organization objects created within certain migration-related tests. This change ensures that each Organization instance in the affected tests now has both an id and a randomly generated slug. No other changes to logic, assertions, or control flow have been made.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/OrganizationServiceCETest.java Updated test cases to set the slug field on Organization objects using a random UUID.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

skip-changelog, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • sharat87

Poem

In the land where tests abide,
Slugs were missing, so we supplied.
UUIDs now fill each gap,
Ensuring migrations run without a trap.
With every slug, our tests grow strong—
Marching migrations right along!
🐌✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 76e1e48 and 4f29575.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/OrganizationServiceCETest.java (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: server-spotless / spotless-check
  • GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/test/java/com/appsmith/server/services/ce/OrganizationServiceCETest.java (1)

313-313: Assigning unique slugs to test organizations is a solid move!

Using UUID.randomUUID().toString() for the slug ensures uniqueness and should help eliminate test flakiness due to slug collisions. No concerns here.

Also applies to: 337-337, 366-366

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@abhvsn abhvsn requested a review from subrata71 April 15, 2025 10:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Bug Something isn't working label Apr 15, 2025
@abhvsn abhvsn requested a review from NilanshBansal April 15, 2025 10:08
@appsmithorg appsmithorg deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 15, 2025
@abhvsn abhvsn merged commit b39d21e into release Apr 15, 2025
19 checks passed
@abhvsn abhvsn deleted the fix/flaky-org-service-test branch April 15, 2025 10:49
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 27, 2025
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@NilanshBansal NilanshBansal NilanshBansal approved these changes

@subrata71 subrata71 Awaiting requested review from subrata71

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@abhvsn @NilanshBansal