Skip to content

Conversation

abhishek-bandameedi
Copy link

@abhishek-bandameedi abhishek-bandameedi commented Jul 24, 2024

Issue

Description:

Updated the alignment of checkbox and its label to center when the size of label is increased.

Screenshots:

Before:

image

After:

image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced end-to-end tests for the Checkbox widget to validate functionality and visual alignment.
    • Added unit tests for the CheckboxComponent to ensure correct rendering and style application.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced styling of the Checkbox widget for better visual presentation and alignment within the user interface.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the Checkbox widget in the web application by introducing comprehensive testing and improving its styling. A new suite of Cypress end-to-end tests validates both the functionality and visual alignment of the widget. Simultaneously, CSS modifications refine the checkbox's appearance, ensuring it aligns with design specifications while preserving its core functionality.

Changes

Files & Directories Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Checkbox/CheckBox2_spec.js
app/client/src/widgets/CheckboxWidget/component/index.test.tsx
Added Cypress end-to-end tests for Checkbox functionality and new unit tests for StyledCheckbox, validating styles and behavior.
app/client/src/widgets/CheckboxWidget/component/index.tsx Enhanced StyledCheckbox component with new CSS properties for improved alignment and positioning of checkbox elements.

Poem

In the land of checkboxes, a tale unfolds,
New tests and styles, a joy to behold.
With alignment so perfect and tests all around,
A user experience, beautifully profound.
Let’s celebrate changes, both big and small,
A Checkbox delight, now loved by all! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30a372a and 6139a49.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Checkbox/CheckBox2_spec.js (1 hunks)
  • app/client/src/widgets/CheckboxWidget/component/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • app/client/src/widgets/CheckboxWidget/component/index.tsx
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Checkbox/CheckBox2_spec.js (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
Additional comments not posted (4)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Checkbox/CheckBox2_spec.js (4)

1-1: Good use of import statement.

The import statement is concise and follows best practices.


3-5: Well-structured describe block.

The describe block is well-defined and uses tags for better categorization.


7-9: Good use of before hook.

The before hook is correctly used to set up the initial state for the tests.


10-13: Good test case for adding a new widget.

The test case is well-defined and checks for the existence of the widget.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6139a49 and 1f26c45.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Checkbox/CheckBox2_spec.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Widgets/Checkbox/CheckBox2_spec.js

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor

@abhishek-bandameedi Can you please explain why we need cypress here? We have seen there is change in src with style updation. This logic can be tested with Jest unit tests or React testing library. Cypress is redundant here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f26c45 and 2e8126e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/src/widgets/CheckboxWidget/component/index.test.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
app/client/src/widgets/CheckboxWidget/component/index.test.tsx (4)

1-7: Good use of necessary imports!

The import statements are appropriate and required for rendering the component and testing its styles.


9-9: Well-defined describe block!

The describe block is correctly used to group related tests for the CheckboxComponent.


10-33: Effective test case!

The test case is well-written and effectively verifies that the align-items style is set to center for the CheckboxComponent.


1-34: Overall, great job on the test file!

The file is well-structured and the test case effectively verifies the CSS changes for the CheckboxComponent.

@abhishek-bandameedi
Copy link
Author

@abhishek-bandameedi Can you please explain why we need cypress here? We have seen there is change in src with style updation. This logic can be tested with Jest unit tests or React testing library. Cypress is redundant here.

Updated unit tests
2e8126e

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 7, 2024

This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Aug 7, 2024
before(() => {
_.agHelper.AddDsl("emptyDSL");
});
it("Add new widget", () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please help me understand the necessity of Cypress test cases in this context? I believe unit testing might be sufficient in this scenario.
Your insights would be appreciated.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 1, 2024

This PR has been closed because of inactivity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants