Skip to content

Conversation

sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 commented Aug 28, 2024

Description

Challenge: In our existing process, when users performed a limited run with a specified count, the results were recorded solely in the logs. This approach introduced an additional step, requiring users to manually navigate through each workflow to check the results, which was both time-consuming and prone to oversight.

Solution: To address this inefficiency, I took the initiative to develop a custom npm library specifically designed to enhance the user experience. This library automates the generation of a summary file that consolidates the run data into a single, easily accessible document. Furthermore, I integrated this solution into our existing workflow by updating the process to automatically post the contents of this summary file as a comment on the relevant PR upon completion of the run.

This improvement not only streamlines the workflow by eliminating the need for users to manually sift through logs, but it also ensures that critical information is immediately available at a glance. By centralizing the results in the PR comments, we’ve enhanced transparency and efficiency, allowing for quicker decision-making and more effective collaboration. This solution is a step forward in optimizing our processes and reducing the manual effort required to track and assess test outcomes.

Looks like this:

Screenshot 2024-08-28 at 11 06 37 AM

Fixes #35920

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Sanity"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/10590991034
Commit: ef6ef69
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Sanity
Spec:


Wed, 28 Aug 2024 06:19:47 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a summary of Cypress test results in pull request comments for improved visibility.
    • Added functionality to upload Cypress summary logs, ensuring availability regardless of previous test outcomes.
  • Dependency Updates

    • Updated the testing package from cypress-repeat-updated to cypress-repeat-pro, potentially enhancing testing capabilities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to GitHub Actions workflows and a modification of a package dependency in the package.json file. New steps are introduced to download and process test summary artifacts, ensuring that logs are preserved and accessible regardless of prior job outcomes. Additionally, a dependency shift from "cypress-repeat-updated" to "cypress-repeat-pro" reflects an update in the testing framework utilized.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/build-client-server-count.yml, .github/workflows/ci-test-limited-with-count.yml New steps added for downloading and uploading Cypress test summary logs, improving CI reporting.
app/client/package.json Dependency changed from "cypress-repeat-updated" to "cypress-repeat-pro" while keeping version ^1.0.1.

Poem

In workflows bright, our changes flow,
With Cypress logs, the test results glow.
From updates new, our paths align,
A smoother CI, where errors decline.
Let artifacts sing, and summaries cheer,
In code we trust, our vision is clear! 🎉


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog CI labels Aug 28, 2024
@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c567b13 and ef6ef69.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • app/client/yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/build-client-server-count.yml (6 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-test-limited-with-count.yml (1 hunks)
  • app/client/package.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/build-client-server-count.yml

263-263: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2002:style:1:23: Useless cat. Consider 'cmd < file | ..' or 'cmd file | ..' instead

(shellcheck)


263-263: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


399-399: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2002:style:1:23: Useless cat. Consider 'cmd < file | ..' or 'cmd file | ..' instead

(shellcheck)


399-399: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

Additional comments not posted (3)
app/client/package.json (1)

123-123: Approved: Dependency change from "cypress-repeat-updated" to "cypress-repeat-pro"

The change in Cypress-related package indicates a shift in functionality or features provided by the testing framework. It's important to ensure that this change aligns with the intended testing strategy and that the new package version is compatible with the existing test setup.

Consider verifying the compatibility and functionality of the new package through additional testing if necessary.

.github/workflows/build-client-server-count.yml (1)

255-266: Approved: Addition of steps to download and process test summary artifacts

The new steps introduced to download and process test summary artifacts enhance the visibility of test outcomes by ensuring that the summary is readily available in the PR comments. This is a positive change that promotes transparency and efficiency.

Consider verifying the correct implementation and functionality of these new steps through additional testing if necessary.

Also applies to: 390-402

Tools
actionlint

263-263: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2002:style:1:23: Useless cat. Consider 'cmd < file | ..' or 'cmd file | ..' instead

(shellcheck)


263-263: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

.github/workflows/ci-test-limited-with-count.yml (1)

359-366: Approved: Addition of an unconditional step to upload the summary logs

The new step to upload the summary logs generated by the Cypress repeat command is a significant enhancement. It ensures that important logs are preserved for review, aiding in debugging and analysis of test runs. This is a positive change that promotes transparency and efficiency.

Consider verifying the correct implementation and functionality of this new step through additional testing if necessary.

@sagar-qa007
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai Generate flow chart

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c567b13 and ef6ef69.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • app/client/yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/build-client-server-count.yml (6 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci-test-limited-with-count.yml (1 hunks)
  • app/client/package.json (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/build-client-server-count.yml

263-263: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2002:style:1:23: Useless cat. Consider 'cmd < file | ..' or 'cmd file | ..' instead

(shellcheck)


263-263: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


399-399: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2002:style:1:23: Useless cat. Consider 'cmd < file | ..' or 'cmd file | ..' instead

(shellcheck)


399-399: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:44: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

Additional comments not posted (2)
app/client/package.json (1)

123-123: Verify compatibility and functionality of the new Cypress package.

The replacement of "cypress-repeat-updated" with "cypress-repeat-pro" suggests an upgrade or shift in functionality. It is crucial to ensure that this change integrates well with the existing Cypress test setup.

Run the following script to check for any breaking changes or major differences in the new package version:

.github/workflows/ci-test-limited-with-count.yml (1)

359-366: Approve the addition of unconditional log preservation.

The new step to unconditionally upload the cypress-repeat-logs artifact ensures that logs are always available for debugging, which is a significant improvement in maintaining transparency and accountability in CI processes.

This change enhances the robustness of the CI workflow by ensuring critical log data is retained for troubleshooting and performance evaluation.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 28, 2024

@​sagar-qa007, here is the flowchart representing the control flow and sequence of steps in the modified GitHub Actions workflows:

flowchart TD
    A[Start] --> B[Download client build artifact]
    B --> C[Read content into environment variable]
    C --> D[Store content in summary_content variable]
    D --> E[Conditional comment actions based on previous jobs]
    E --> F[Upload Cypress summary logs]
    F --> G[End]
Loading

This flowchart outlines the key steps in the workflows, including downloading the artifact, reading its content, storing it in an environment variable, and uploading the summary logs. The conditional comment actions are based on the results of previous jobs, ensuring that the summary content is available for use.

Let me know if you need any further modifications or additional details!

Actions performed

Comments resolved.

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Aug 28, 2024
@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 merged commit d0e5085 into release Aug 28, 2024
50 checks passed
@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 deleted the fix/repeatesummaryoncomment branch August 28, 2024 06:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants