Skip to content

Conversation

spacewander
Copy link
Member

According to the https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause-Views.html, the license is 'identical to BSD-2-Clause with the addition of the "views and conclusions" sentence at the end'

According to the https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause-Views.html,
the license is 'identical to BSD-2-Clause with the addition of the "views and conclusions" sentence at the end'
@wu-sheng
Copy link
Member

I think whether this is compatible with APLv2, it should be determined by ASF legal team.

@wu-sheng
Copy link
Member

I can see from the description, this may be fine. But I am not from legal part.

@spacewander
Copy link
Member Author

Is there someone from ASF legal team we can consult?

@wu-sheng
Copy link
Member

We are following here, https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html

Raise the topic on legal-discuss@ or via a JIRA issue if you have doubt over whether a work falls in the public domain.

This is recommended from that page.

@spacewander
Copy link
Member Author

I consulted people in the legal-discuss mail list: https://lists.apache.org/thread/j5o539nwfpfqpr75rn70622gfng1tjh0,

it is compatible with the Apache license.

@wu-sheng wu-sheng added this to the 0.7.0 milestone May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants