Skip to content

Conversation

srivarra
Copy link
Contributor

If you haven't already, please read through our contributing guidelines before opening your PR

What is the purpose of this PR?

Closes #19.

How did you implement your changes

Added some logic for handling None values and lists of size 0.

Remaining issues

N/A

@srivarra srivarra added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 13, 2023
@srivarra srivarra self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 4409978755

  • 20 of 20 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.1%) to 96.899%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 4388680983: 0.1%
Covered Lines: 438
Relevant Lines: 450

💛 - Coveralls

@srivarra srivarra marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2023 22:11
@srivarra srivarra requested a review from alex-l-kong March 13, 2023 22:11
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-l-kong alex-l-kong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@srivarra srivarra merged commit 553b4c5 into main Apr 10, 2023
@srivarra srivarra deleted the verify_list_size_0 branch April 10, 2023 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

verify_in_list and verify_same_elements should handle lists of size 0, and None
3 participants