Thank you for submitting your pull request. I’ve reviewed the changes, focusing on the updates to the CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION. Here are my observations and suggestions:

1. Consistency Across Targets

• Issue: The CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION is being updated from different values (1 and 18) to 21 across various targets (iOS app, extensions, watch apps, macOS app, etc.).
• Suggestion: Ensure that all targets should indeed share the same CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION. If different targets have distinct versioning schemes, it might lead to confusion or inconsistencies in version tracking. Consider standardizing the versioning approach across all targets or clearly documenting the reasons for differing version numbers.

2. Versioning Scheme Alignment

• Issue: The jump from 18 or 1 to 21 is significant. It’s essential to ensure that this aligns with your project's versioning strategy (e.g., Semantic Versioning).
• Suggestion:
  • Semantic Versioning: If you’re following Semantic Versioning, typically, the CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION (often used as the build number) increments with each build, while the MARKETING_VERSION reflects major, minor, and patch versions. Ensure that your increments correspond to meaningful changes.
  • Build Automation: To minimize manual errors, consider automating the build number increment using scripts or tools like agvtool or third-party solutions like Fastlane.

3. Impact on Dependency Management

• Issue: Changing the CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION might affect dependencies, especially if other modules or services rely on specific version numbers.
• Suggestion: Verify that this version update won’t disrupt any dependencies or integrations. Communicate changes with team members who manage dependent projects or services.

4. Update Related Version Fields If Necessary

• Observation: The MARKETING_VERSION remains at 1.0 for some targets.
• Suggestion: Ensure that the MARKETING_VERSION aligns with the CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION where appropriate. While they serve different purposes (public version vs. build number), maintaining a coherent relationship can aid in version tracking and user communication.

5. Documentation and Changelog Updates

• Issue: Significant version changes should be reflected in your project’s documentation and changelog.
• Suggestion:
  • Changelog: Update the changelog to record the version bump from 18 or 1 to 21, including the reasons for the change.
  • Documentation: Ensure any architecture or deployment documentation reflects the new versioning scheme.

6. Validation and Testing

• Issue: Ensuring that the version change doesn’t inadvertently affect the build or deployment process.
• Suggestion:
  • CI/CD Pipelines: Verify that your continuous integration and deployment pipelines handle the new CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION correctly.
  • Beta Testing: If applicable, test the versioned builds in beta environments to ensure stability.

7. Code Signing and Entitlements

• Observation: While not directly related to the version change, maintaining consistency in CODE_SIGN_ENTITLEMENTS and other build settings is crucial.
• Suggestion: Double-check that entitlements and code signing configurations remain correct after the version updates to prevent any signing issues.

8. Potential for Centralized Configuration

• Issue: Multiple targets have similar build settings, leading to repetitive updates.
• Suggestion:
  • Xcode Configuration Files: Consider using Xcode configuration files (.xcconfig) to centralize shared build settings. This approach reduces redundancy and simplifies updates across multiple targets.
  • Swift Package Manager or Other Tools: If applicable, leverage package managers or build tools to manage shared configurations.

Summary

The primary change involves updating the CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION across multiple targets from 1 or 18 to 21. Ensure that this update aligns with your versioning strategy, is consistently applied where necessary, and that any dependent processes or documentation are appropriately updated. Automating version increments and centralizing build settings can also enhance maintainability and reduce the potential for errors.

Let me know if you need further clarification or assistance!

Code Review for SectionsListView

You've made some meaningful changes to the SectionsListView, particularly in enhancing readability and adjusting layout constraints. Below are my observations, constructive criticisms, and suggestions to further improve the code:

1. Layout Adjustments with availableHeight

Changes:

- let availableHeight = max(geometry.size.height - 190, 0)
+ let availableHeight = max(geometry.size.height - 190, 30)
...
- let availableHeight = max(geometry.size.height - 330, 0)
+ let availableHeight = max(geometry.size.height - 330, 268)

Feedback:

• Minimum Height Constraints: Introducing a minimum height of 30 and 268 respectively prevents the view from collapsing too much, which is good for maintaining usability. However, it's unclear why these specific values were chosen.

• Magic Numbers: The numbers 30 and 268 appear arbitrary. To enhance readability and maintainability, define these as named constants. For example:

  private let minHeightForWidth95: CGFloat = 30
  private let minHeightForWidthFull: CGFloat = 268
  
  // Usage
  let availableHeight = max(geometry.size.height - 190, minHeightForWidth95)

• Responsive Design: Ensure these constants adapt well across different device sizes and orientations. If these values are based on design specifications, it might be helpful to reference them from a centralized configuration.

2. Replacing Ternary Operators with if-else Statements

Changes:

- (newValue + tasksCount) > 0 ? badgeManager.setBadge(number: (newValue + tasksCount)) : badgeManager.resetBadgeNumber()
+ if (newValue + tasksCount) > 0 {
+     badgeManager.setBadge(number: (newValue + tasksCount))
+ } else {
+     badgeManager.resetBadgeNumber()
+ }

Feedback:

• Readability: Switching from a ternary operator to an if-else statement improves readability, especially when performing actions rather than simple value assignments. This change enhances the clarity of the code.

• Consistency: Ensure that this style is consistently applied throughout the codebase. Avoid mixing ternary operators and if-else statements for similar logic to maintain uniformity.

• Simplification: If the logic becomes more complex in the future, this structure will scale better than a nested ternary.

3. DRY Principle for Badge Management

Observation:
The badge update logic is duplicated in both onChange and onAppear closures.

Feedback:

• Extract Common Logic: To adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider extracting the badge update logic into a separate method. This reduces redundancy and makes maintenance easier.

Suggestion:

private func updateBadge(with count: Int) {
    if count > 0 {
        badgeManager.setBadge(number: count)
    } else {
        badgeManager.resetBadgeNumber()
    }
    WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines()
}

Usage:

.onChange(of: projects.filter { TasksQuery.filterProjectToReview($0) }.count) { _, newValue in
    if showReviewProjectsBadge {
        let tasksCount = tasksTodayActive.count
        updateBadge(with: newValue + tasksCount)
    }
}
...
.onAppear {
    var projectsCount = 0
    if showReviewProjectsBadge {
        projectsCount = projects.filter { TasksQuery.filterProjectToReview($0) }.count
    }
    updateBadge(with: tasksTodayActive.count + projectsCount)
}

4. Optimizing Widget Timeline Reloads

Observation:
WidgetCenter.shared.reloadAllTimelines() is called after setting or resetting the badge.

Feedback:

• Performance Consideration: reloadAllTimelines() reloads all widget timelines, which might be unnecessary and could impact performance.

• Scoped Reloading: If possible, reload only the specific widget that needs updating using reloadTimelines(ofKind:). This approach is more efficient.

Suggestion:

WidgetCenter.shared.reloadTimelines(ofKind: "YourWidgetKind")

Replace "YourWidgetKind" with the actual kind identifier of your widget.

5. Handling State and Data Flow

Observation:
The badge count depends on both projects and tasksTodayActive.

Feedback:

• Combine Publishers: Consider using Combine to manage data flow and state updates more declaratively. This can help in managing dependencies between different pieces of state and reduce boilerplate code.

• Performance: Continuously filtering projects inside onChange and onAppear can be optimized. If projects is large, repeated filtering might be costly.

Suggestion:

• Memoization: Cache the filtered projects if the filtering criteria don’t change frequently.
• State Variables: Use @State or @Published properties to hold filtered results, updating them reactively when projects or related criteria change.

6. Code Formatting and Styling

Feedback:

• Consistent Indentation: Ensure consistent indentation for better readability. Misaligned braces or inconsistent spacing can make the code harder to read and maintain.

• Parentheses Usage: While parentheses improve clarity, excessive use can clutter the code. Swift's operator precedence handles most cases, so use parentheses judiciously.

Example:

if tasksTodayActive.count + projectsCount > 0 {
    badgeManager.setBadge(number: tasksTodayActive.count + projectsCount)
} else {
    badgeManager.resetBadgeNumber()
}

7. Documentation and Comments

Feedback:

• Explain Magic Numbers: As previously mentioned, document the reasons behind specific constants like 30 and 268. This aids future developers in understanding the intent without digging through UI designs.

• Method Documentation: If you extract methods (e.g., updateBadge), add comments explaining their purpose, parameters, and usage scenarios.

8. Testing Considerations

Feedback:

• Unit Tests: Ensure that there are unit tests covering the badge update logic, especially the conditions under which badges are set or reset.

• UI Tests: Verify that the layout adjustments behave as expected across different device sizes and orientations.

Summary

Your changes improve code clarity by replacing ternary operators with if-else statements and introduce sensible constraints to the view's layout. To further enhance the code:

1. Avoid Magic Numbers: Use named constants and document their purpose.
2. Extract Repeated Logic: Create helper methods for repeated operations like badge updates.
3. Optimize Performance: Limit widget timeline reloads to specific widgets and optimize data filtering.
4. Enhance Readability: Maintain consistent code formatting and style.
5. Implement Testing: Ensure robust testing to cover new changes and logic.

Incorporating these suggestions will lead to a more maintainable, efficient, and readable codebase.