-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Release 1.2 #117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 1.2 #117
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review by ChatGPT
@@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ | |||
<array> | |||
<string>remote-notification</string> | |||
<string>fetch</string> | |||
<string>processing</string> | |||
</array> | |||
<key>UILaunchScreen</key> | |||
<false/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for submitting your pull request. I've reviewed the changes, specifically the removal of the <string>processing</string>
entry from the <array>
. Here are my observations and suggestions:
-
Justification for Removal:
- Assessment Needed: Ensure that the
processing
background mode is no longer required by your application. This mode is typically used for long-running background tasks utilizingBGProcessingTask
in theBGTaskScheduler
. - Action Item: Verify that there are no ongoing or planned background processing tasks that rely on this mode. Removing it without ensuring its redundancy might lead to unintended behavior or limitations in background processing capabilities.
- Assessment Needed: Ensure that the
-
Impact Analysis:
- Functionality Check: If your app previously utilized background processing (e.g., syncing large data sets, performing intensive computations), removing this mode could disrupt those functionalities.
- User Experience: Consider if users expect certain background operations to continue seamlessly. Any disruption might affect the overall user experience.
-
App Store Compliance:
- Permissions Audit: Apple's App Store guidelines emphasize declaring only necessary background modes to minimize resource usage and protect user privacy. If
processing
was included but not actively used, its removal aligns with best practices. - Documentation Update: Ensure that any related documentation or developer notes reflect this change to maintain clarity for future maintenance.
- Permissions Audit: Apple's App Store guidelines emphasize declaring only necessary background modes to minimize resource usage and protect user privacy. If
-
Codebase Consistency:
- Related Code Review: Search the codebase for any references to background processing tasks. Ensure that associated code is either removed or refactored appropriately to prevent potential runtime errors.
- Dependency Check: Confirm that no third-party libraries or modules depend on the
processing
background mode.
-
Testing Recommendations:
- Comprehensive Testing: After removing the
processing
mode, conduct thorough testing, especially around background operations, to ensure that the app behaves as expected. - Edge Cases: Test scenarios where background processing might have been triggered to observe any changes in behavior or performance.
- Comprehensive Testing: After removing the
-
Version Control Best Practices:
- Commit Messages: Ensure that commit messages clearly explain the rationale behind removing the
processing
mode. This aids future developers in understanding the context of this change. - Revert Plan: Have a strategy in place to revert this change if unforeseen issues arise post-deployment.
- Commit Messages: Ensure that commit messages clearly explain the rationale behind removing the
Conclusion:
Removing the <string>processing</string>
from the <array>
is a clean change provided that the app no longer requires background processing capabilities. Ensure that this removal does not inadvertently affect any existing functionalities and that thorough testing is conducted to validate the change.
If after evaluation you confirm that the processing
mode is unnecessary, proceed with the change. Otherwise, consider retaining it or documenting the reasons for its removal comprehensively.
@@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ | |||
"@executable_path/../Frameworks", | |||
); | |||
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET = 14.0; | |||
MARKETING_VERSION = 1.1; | |||
MARKETING_VERSION = 1.2; | |||
PRODUCT_BUNDLE_IDENTIFIER = com.amikhaylin.PomPadDo; | |||
PRODUCT_NAME = PomPadDo; | |||
SWIFT_EMIT_LOC_STRINGS = YES; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Review: Version Increment Updates
Summary:
The pull request includes updates across multiple Xcode project targets, specifically incrementing CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION
from 16 to 18 and MARKETING_VERSION
from 1.1 to 1.2. While the changes appear consistent across various extensions and platforms (iOS, watchOS, macOS), there are a few areas to consider for improvement and verification.
1. Version Increment Consistency
- Skipping Version 17:
- Observation: The
CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION
is being incremented from 16 directly to 18, skipping version 17. - Recommendation: Ensure that version 17 was intentionally omitted. If version 17 was previously used and perhaps deprecated or merged incorrectly, document the reason for skipping to maintain clarity for future maintenance and team members.
- Observation: The
2. Semantic Versioning for MARKETING_VERSION
- Version Jump from 1.1 to 1.2:
- Observation: The
MARKETING_VERSION
is uniformly updated from 1.1 to 1.2 across all targets. - Recommendation:
- Consistency Check: Confirm that this version bump aligns with the release strategy (e.g., new features warranting a minor version increase).
- Impact Assessment: Ensure that any dependencies, App Store metadata, or external integrations that reference the marketing version are compatible with this update.
- Observation: The
3. Deployment Targets and SDKs
- SDKROOT Changes:
- Observation: The
SDKROOT
for various targets (e.g.,iphoneos
,watchos
,macosx
) remains unchanged. - Recommendation: While not directly related to this PR, verify that the updated versions (
CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION
andMARKETING_VERSION
) are compatible with the current SDKs and deployment targets. This ensures there are no compatibility issues post-update.
- Observation: The
4. Code Signing and Entitlements
- Consistent Code Signing Settings:
- Observation: The
CODE_SIGN_ENTITLEMENTS
andCODE_SIGN_STYLE
remain consistent withAutomatic
signing across all targets. - Recommendation:
- Verification: Double-check that the entitlements files referenced (e.g.,
PomPadDoWidgetsExtension.entitlements
) are up-to-date and correctly configured to work with the new versions. - Testing: Ensure that the automatic code signing process correctly handles the updated project versions without introducing signing issues during the build or deployment phases.
- Verification: Double-check that the entitlements files referenced (e.g.,
- Observation: The
5. Build Settings and Flags
- Hardening Runtime and Other Flags:
- Observation: Settings like
ENABLE_HARDENED_RUNTIME
,DEAD_CODE_STRIPPING
, andCOMBINE_HIDPI_IMAGES
remain unchanged. - Recommendation: Although not directly related to the version increments, it's a good practice to verify that these settings are still optimal and do not conflict with the new version changes. Ensure that enabling/disabling these flags aligns with the app's security and performance requirements.
- Observation: Settings like
6. Documentation and Changelog Updates
- Release Notes:
- Recommendation: Ensure that the version updates (
1.2
for marketing and18
for project version) are reflected in the project's changelog or release notes. This aids in tracking changes and communicating updates to stakeholders and users.
- Recommendation: Ensure that the version updates (
7. Automated Checks and CI Integration
- CI Pipeline:
- Recommendation: Verify that any Continuous Integration (CI) workflows or automated testing pipelines are aware of the new version numbers. Update scripts or configuration files if they rely on specific version patterns or ranges.
Conclusion
The version increment updates are straightforward and consistently applied across multiple targets. However, attention should be paid to the skipped CURRENT_PROJECT_VERSION
(from 16 to 18) to ensure intentionality and clear documentation. Additionally, verifying compatibility with existing configurations, dependencies, and ensuring proper documentation will help maintain project integrity and facilitate smooth transitions during releases.
Suggestions for Future Pull Requests:
-
Granular Changes: For better traceability, consider isolating version updates into a separate pull request. This makes it easier to track and review such changes independently.
-
Automated Version Management: Implement tools like SwiftVersion or other version management scripts to handle version increments systematically, reducing the risk of manual errors.
Feel free to reach out if there are specific areas you'd like a deeper review on or if there are additional changes accompanying these version updates.
No description provided.