Skip to content

Re-definition of VRAM_ADRSTINC_128 #221

@daniel-starke

Description

@daniel-starke

From a programmers perspective it makes no difference which value is used if both values do the same and it is only to control the behavior. Which is the case for VRAM_ADRSTINC_128. Therefore, I suggest to remove one of the definitions of VRAM_ADRSTINC_128 or comment one out to avoid re-definition of the same enumeration value.

See:

VRAM_ADRSTINC_128 = (2 << 0), /*!< \brief Address Increment Step (0..3 = Increment Word-Address by 1,32,128,128) */
VRAM_ADRSTINC_128 = (3 << 0), /*!< \brief Address Increment Step (0..3 = Increment Word-Address by 1,32,128,128) */

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions