Skip to content

Conversation

Aaronontheweb
Copy link
Member

close #2783

Copy link
Member Author

@Aaronontheweb Aaronontheweb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Detailed my changes

@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ public void UseRoleIgnoredSpecs()
A_cluster_must_start_cluster();
A_cluster_must_pool_local_off_roles_off();
A_cluster_must_group_local_off_roles_off();
//A_cluster_must_pool_local_on_role_b();
A_cluster_must_pool_local_on_role_b();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Allowed to test to run

// for binary backwards compatibility reasons
var deprecatedNrOfInstances = pool.NrOfInstances;

var nrOfRoutees = deprecatedNrOfInstances < 0
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any routers that are compiled without NrOfInstances(ActorSystem) can't run on 1.1 or later anyway.

@heynickc
Copy link
Contributor

@Aaronontheweb looks like a spec failed on Windows: Akka.Remote.Tests.ActorsLeakSpec.Remoting_must_not_leak_actors. I'm going to kick off the Windows Unit Tests again.

@Aaronontheweb
Copy link
Member Author

@heynickc yeah that one needs some hardening, but that spec failure is unrelated to this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When using clustered pool, if use-local-routees is on, it seems to ignore the use-role property
2 participants