Skip to content

Conversation

vincent-d
Copy link

Contribution description

Add config for stm32f091 and nucleo-f091

Issues/PRs references

@aabadie
Copy link
Owner

aabadie commented May 28, 2018

Thanks, but to minimize the final size of this PR, I wanted to do this once the new I2C interface feature branch is merged. Is it ok ?
But I guess you could also make it work on this board :)

@vincent-d
Copy link
Author

I don't mind, I needed this to test on one of the f0 I have ;)

I'll rebase this once everything is merged.

@aabadie
Copy link
Owner

aabadie commented May 28, 2018

I should have configured this one, since I also have it. But finally went for the f070...

@aabadie aabadie force-pushed the new_i2c_stm32l0_f3 branch 3 times, most recently from d4a77a6 to fce19d1 Compare May 29, 2018 21:27
@aabadie aabadie force-pushed the new_i2c_stm32l0_f3 branch 5 times, most recently from 0ba7d9d to 5275fa9 Compare June 13, 2018 08:24
@aabadie aabadie force-pushed the new_i2c_stm32l0_f3 branch 3 times, most recently from 8209dfb to fafec43 Compare June 13, 2018 12:15
@aabadie aabadie closed this Jun 21, 2018
@aabadie
Copy link
Owner

aabadie commented Aug 7, 2018

@vincent-d, now that I2C refactoring is in, you can rebase and PR this upstream. I have the hardware for testing :)

@vincent-d
Copy link
Author

see RIOT-OS#9727

@vincent-d vincent-d deleted the pr/new_i2c_f091 branch August 8, 2018 09:58
aabadie pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2019
suit/examples: add wireless examples and doc
aabadie pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2021
Consider the following configuration:

    nib prefix
    2001:16b8:4569:88fc::/62 dev #7  expires 7081 sec deprecates 3481 sec
    2001:16b8:4569:88fe::/63 dev #6

If `_on_link()` stops at the first match, a packet received from #7 with a
destination in the downstream subnet in #6 would always be sent back via #7
if this happens to be the first entry in the list.

Instead, consider all prefixes and return the one that is the closest match.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants