docs: backup and restore to single OCI layout #1775
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1775 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 85.43% 85.43%
=======================================
Files 137 137
Lines 5951 5951
=======================================
Hits 5084 5084
Misses 616 616
Partials 251 251 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
shizhMSFT
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2025
Signed-off-by: Terry Howe <terrylhowe@gmail.com>
f29e199 to
b09d63e
Compare
This was referenced Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
@sajayantony and @shizhMSFT suggested using a single OCI layout for the directory structure of the backup. It seems to work well in my basic backup/restore PR #1769