Skip to content

Update SECURITY-INSIGHTS #551

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 7, 2025
Merged

Update SECURITY-INSIGHTS #551

merged 8 commits into from
Aug 7, 2025

Conversation

aaguiarz
Copy link
Member

@aaguiarz aaguiarz commented Aug 6, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Automated update of SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml file

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a comprehensive security insights configuration file outlining project metadata, team contacts, licensing, release information, documentation links, security self-assessment, and details of security tools in use.

@aaguiarz aaguiarz requested a review from a team as a code owner August 6, 2025 10:22
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

A new configuration file, .github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml, has been introduced to the repository. This YAML file documents security-related metadata, repository details, licensing, release information, documentation links, security self-assessment, security champions, and tools used for security monitoring and automation.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Security Insights Configuration
.github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml		 Added a new YAML file outlining project security metadata, repository info, licensing, release, documentation, security self-assessment, security champions, and security tools configuration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/security-insights

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Aug 6, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml (1)

64-96: Consider adding explicit type fields for future-proofing security tool entries

While the current SCA scanner definitions are clear, explicitly declaring a source or scope field (e.g., runtime, dev, container) is becoming common practice and improves machine-readability when multiple tools of the same type are defined.
Not blocking, but worth considering for long-term maintainability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51087d7 and 20a9e6d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/SECURITY-INSIGHTS.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Test Release Process
  • GitHub Check: Tests
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)

@rhamzeh rhamzeh enabled auto-merge August 7, 2025 11:40
@rhamzeh rhamzeh disabled auto-merge August 7, 2025 11:41
@aaguiarz aaguiarz added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 7, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit aa2dda9 Aug 7, 2025
22 checks passed
@aaguiarz aaguiarz deleted the feat/security-insights branch August 7, 2025 11:52
@aaguiarz aaguiarz mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2025
Closed
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

@rhamzeh rhamzeh rhamzeh approved these changes

@curfew-marathon curfew-marathon curfew-marathon approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@aaguiarz @rhamzeh @curfew-marathon