Skip to content

Conversation

xadupre
Copy link
Contributor

@xadupre xadupre commented Jun 12, 2024

Description

As the title says.

Signed-off-by: Xavier Dupre <xadupre@microsoft.com>
@xadupre xadupre requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2024 11:06
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.05%. Comparing base (83194ed) to head (f0bc662).
Report is 38 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6173      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.95%   57.05%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         506      506              
  Lines       30467    30941     +474     
  Branches     4592     4595       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        17353    17652     +299     
- Misses      12285    12464     +179     
+ Partials      829      825       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

xadupre added 2 commits June 12, 2024 14:13
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dupre <xadupre@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dupre <xadupre@microsoft.com>
@xadupre xadupre changed the title Better name for Github Action Better name for Github Action and fix Windows build on CI Jun 12, 2024
@xadupre xadupre enabled auto-merge June 12, 2024 12:59
@justinchuby justinchuby disabled auto-merge June 12, 2024 14:59
Copy link
Member

@justinchuby justinchuby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Directly calling setup.py is deprecated, so we probably shouldn't do it. Do we know why it behaves differently in py38/39? Did anything change for the pipelines (they used to work)?

Also - once we include all information in the names, complications arise when we want to tweak some options - the names will change and we will need to go into github settings and mark/unmark required checks. I wonder if it is a good idea to print these information as a step in the job?

@xadupre
Copy link
Contributor Author

xadupre commented Jun 12, 2024

Directly calling setup.py is deprecated, so we probably shouldn't do it. Do we know why it behaves differently in py38/39? Did anything change for the pipelines (they used to work)?

I suggest keeping it for this PR. We can still fix it later.

@gramalingam gramalingam added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into onnx:main with commit 06d4691 Jun 12, 2024
@xadupre xadupre self-assigned this Jun 21, 2024
@cjvolzka cjvolzka mentioned this pull request Jul 19, 2024
andife pushed a commit to andife/onnx that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2024
### Description
As the title says.

---------

Signed-off-by: Xavier Dupre <xadupre@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fehlner <fehlner@arcor.de>
linshokaku pushed a commit to linshokaku/onnx that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
### Description
As the title says.

---------

Signed-off-by: Xavier Dupre <xadupre@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Linsho Kaku <linsho@preferred.jp>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants