Skip to content

Replace sanity with saftey for inclusive terminology #5802

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2023

Conversation

cjvolzka
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Replace "sanity" with "safety".

Motivation and Context

Inclusive terminology change

Signed-off-by: Charles Volzka <cjvolzka@us.ibm.com>
@cjvolzka cjvolzka requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2023 15:03
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6ff456c) 56.34% compared to head (6c26534) 56.34%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5802   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.34%   56.34%           
=======================================
  Files         503      503           
  Lines       29622    29622           
  Branches     4434     4434           
=======================================
  Hits        16690    16690           
  Misses      12120    12120           
  Partials      812      812           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@justinchuby
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the change! Do we have a guidance on inclusive language use? To me “soundness” seems to carry a closer meaning than “safety” as the intended. As “safety” often mean the lack of exploits or being safe in program behavior imo.

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/282282/near-universally-applicable-alternative-to-sanity-check

@cjvolzka
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In IBM we generally move "sanity" to "safety" by default but it's not required. If the ONNX community has a preference to another term, I'm happy to switch to that. I've seen other repos go with "smoke tests" too.

@justinchuby
Copy link
Member

@onnx/sig-operators-approvers to chime in

@gramalingam gramalingam added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 14, 2023
Merged via the queue into onnx:main with commit c92866c Dec 14, 2023
@cjvolzka cjvolzka deleted the words-matter branch July 26, 2024 14:19
linshokaku pushed a commit to linshokaku/onnx that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
### Description
Replace "sanity" with "safety".

### Motivation and Context
Inclusive terminology change

Signed-off-by: Charles Volzka <cjvolzka@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linsho Kaku <linsho@preferred.jp>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants