-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
Closed
Labels
contributions welcometopic: enhancementRequest for new feature or operatorRequest for new feature or operatortopic: operatorIssues related to ONNX operatorsIssues related to ONNX operators
Milestone
Description
System information
No response
What is the problem that this feature solves?
Currently to implement any
and or
we will have to convert BOOL inputs to int64 before reducing, then convert them back to BOOL after reduction. We can extend ReduceMin/ReduceMax to take BOOL inputs to avoid this conversion. Comparison will follow the usual False < True
.
microsoft/onnxscript#932 (comment)
Alternatives considered
Create two new ops: ReduceAnd, ReduceOr
Describe the feature
No response
Will this influence the current api (Y/N)?
N
Feature Area
operators
Are you willing to contribute it (Y/N)
Yes
Notes
No response
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
contributions welcometopic: enhancementRequest for new feature or operatorRequest for new feature or operatortopic: operatorIssues related to ONNX operatorsIssues related to ONNX operators