-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 641
refactor(transformer/using): rename vars #9677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(transformer/using): rename vars #9677
Conversation
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:
You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #9677 will create unknown performance changesComparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
|
@camc314 Sorry for the litany of small changes. I've split it up into multiple PRs so you can follow what I've done, and the rationale for the changes. |
these PRs are great, very easy to review 🙂 |
8d255b1
to
2043688
Compare
890413f
to
9743ebb
Compare
Merge activity
|
2043688
to
d06e5f2
Compare
Follow-on after #9310. Pure refactor. Just rename vars to be more descriptively named, rather than generic names like `node`.
9743ebb
to
acac461
Compare
d06e5f2
to
36aa13d
Compare
Follow-on after #9310. Pure refactor. Just rename vars to be more descriptively named, rather than generic names like `node`.
acac461
to
26499ec
Compare
Follow-on after #9310. Pure refactor. Just rename vars to be more descriptively named, rather than generic names like `node`.
36aa13d
to
15dd0d4
Compare
26499ec
to
664c6f8
Compare
Follow-on after #9310. Pure refactor. Just rename vars to be more descriptively named, rather than generic names like
node
.