Skip to content

Conversation

camc314
Copy link
Contributor

@camc314 camc314 commented Dec 16, 2024

@overlookmotel suggested this here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

camc314 commented Dec 16, 2024


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior label Dec 16, 2024
@camc314 camc314 marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 10:34
@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/12-16-refactor_benchmark_transform_code_before_codegen branch from f67b623 to bd293fc Compare December 16, 2024 10:51
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 16, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #7934 will not alter performance

Comparing c/12-16-refactor_benchmark_transform_code_before_codegen (9b3a2be) with main (84b75a0)

Summary

✅ 29 untouched benchmarks

@overlookmotel
Copy link
Member

I think this is a good change. Our codegen_sourcemap benchmark previously was unrealistic because the AST it printed had no modifications made to it after the parser. In real world, I assume you always modify the AST in some way before codegen. What would be the point of parsing a file and printing it again if nothing changes in between?

But @Boshen can you confirm you agree?

@camc314 camc314 force-pushed the c/12-16-refactor_benchmark_transform_code_before_codegen branch 2 times, most recently from 948da44 to f9f88b2 Compare December 16, 2024 12:49
@Boshen Boshen added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

Boshen commented Dec 16, 2024

Merge activity

  • Dec 16, 7:51 AM EST: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Dec 16, 8:07 AM EST: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Dec 16, 8:12 AM EST: A user merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.

@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the c/12-16-refactor_benchmark_transform_code_before_codegen branch from f9f88b2 to 9b3a2be Compare December 16, 2024 13:08
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit 9b3a2be into main Dec 16, 2024
25 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the c/12-16-refactor_benchmark_transform_code_before_codegen branch December 16, 2024 13:12
overlookmotel added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Follow-on after #7934. Pure refactor. Make codegen benchmark simpler.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants